The Dirt Files

A newly added page to the website. All you ever wanted to know about the Clintons but were afraid to ask.

There is a storm going on right now... The rainfall expected is massive. If that isn't alarming enough, this storm is situating over fault lines.

Also, let's not forget the recent earthquake, a Mw 7.7 earthquake struck the Sagaing Region of Myanmar, with an epicenter close to Mandalay, the country's second-largest city. The strike-slip shock achieved a maximum Modified Mercalli intensity of IX

On this date 214 years ago, one of the most powerful natural disasters in American history struck the heart of the continent. Between December 1811 and February 1812, a series of massive earthquakes rocked the central United States along what is now known as the New Madrid Seismic Zone. The strongest of these events occurred on February 7, 1812, and remains one of the most powerful earthquakes to ever strike the continental U.S., with an estimated magnitude of 7.5 to 8.0.

Centered near the town of New Madrid in what was then the Missouri Territory, the earthquake was felt over an area of nearly one million square miles. Reports at the time described the Mississippi River flowing backward, large fissures opening in the ground, and entire sections of land subsiding. Church bells rang in Boston, sidewalks cracked in Washington D.C., and chimneys toppled in cities hundreds of miles away. The shaking was so intense that it permanently altered the geography of the Mississippi Valley and created Reelfoot Lake in present-day Tennessee.

The quake occurred in what geologists now recognize as an intraplate fault zone, a rare phenomenon far from tectonic plate boundaries. This has made the New Madrid Seismic Zone a focus of ongoing concern among seismologists, emergency planners, and engineers. Unlike the West Coast, where earthquakes are more frequent and building codes account for them, the central U.S. remains relatively unprepared for a quake of similar magnitude. The region's clay-rich soil can amplify seismic waves, spreading the damage over vast distances.

Today, the population in and around the New Madrid Seismic Zone—including major urban areas like St. Louis and Memphis—numbers in the millions. Experts warn that a repeat event could have catastrophic consequences for modern infrastructure, transportation networks, and energy systems. 

A vandal keyed a Tesla and caused $4800 USD damage, and the owner set out to find him. Get ready because this video keeps ramping up and gets crazier and crazier.

THIS GUY KEYED THE WRONG TESLA

In 2022, a notable incident occurred involving the vandalism of a Tesla vehicle, which was captured by the car's integrated Sentry Mode—a surveillance system designed to monitor and record activities around the vehicle. The footage revealed an individual intentionally keying the Tesla, resulting in approximately $4,800 in damages. Determined to hold the perpetrator accountable, the Tesla owner utilized the recorded evidence to identify and locate the individual responsible. The owner's proactive approach, combined with the clear video evidence, led to the apprehension of the vandal. This case underscored the effectiveness of Tesla's Sentry Mode in not only deterring malicious activities but also in providing crucial evidence that aids in law enforcement investigations.​Tesla News

Denmark has remained one of Ukraine’s most consistent military backers since the beginning of the war with Russia, securing a place among NATO’s top four donors in terms of military aid. Despite its relatively small size and modest population, Denmark has made outsized contributions in both equipment and financial support, earning recognition and praise from NATO officials and European allies alike.

Danish Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen recently reaffirmed Copenhagen's long-term commitment to supporting Kyiv, stating that continued military support for Ukraine is not just strategic, but a source of national pride. He emphasized that “military support for Ukraine is an absolute priority for the government,” and that Denmark would stand with Ukraine “as long as it is needed.”

However, Denmark now finds itself navigating an unexpected geopolitical controversy—this time not over Eastern Europe, but in the far North. The long-dormant question of Greenland’s future status has reemerged on the global stage, sparked once again by comments from former President Donald Trump.

Trump, who previously floated the idea of purchasing Greenland from Denmark during his first term, reignited the issue by stating he has "refused to take military force off the table" in regard to the U.S. acquiring the Arctic territory. The statement has caused diplomatic discomfort in Copenhagen and stirred tension between NATO allies at a time when unity over the Ukraine conflict is seen as critical.

Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark with its own government, has long held strategic importance due to its vast resources and proximity to the Arctic and North America.

 I got hit with another process server with news of another lawsuit, I spoke with Olivia Nuzzi, and the Trump administration is basically adopting a BLM position on antisemitism. -- Candace Owens

BREAKING NEWS: I Got Served For ANOTHER Lawsuit | Candace Ep 169

This topic touches on a very active and contentious debate involving free speech, definitions of antisemitism, and the scope of legal protections—particularly in academic, political, and journalistic environments.

There have been legislative efforts in the U.S. and other countries to adopt definitions of antisemitism that include certain criticisms of Israel, especially when those criticisms are perceived as denying Israel's right to exist, using double standards, or invoking longstanding anti-Jewish tropes. One widely cited definition comes from the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which has been endorsed by several governments and institutions. Some versions of this definition include examples where criticism of Israel “becomes antisemitic,” such as comparing Israeli policy to Nazi Germany or holding Israel to standards not applied to other nations.

Supporters of these measures argue that antisemitism often hides behind criticism of Israel and that clearer definitions are necessary to protect Jewish communities from hate speech and discrimination, especially as antisemitic incidents rise globally.

However, critics—ranging from free speech advocates to academics and even some Jewish groups—argue that codifying these definitions into law risks criminalizing or chilling legitimate political discourse.

On March 28, 2025, a significant transaction occurred on the CME Group's COMEX exchange, where an entity acquired over 45,000 gold futures contracts, representing approximately 4.5 million troy ounces of gold—valued at around $14 billion. This purchase was notable not only for its size but also because it was made just before the contracts' expiration, indicating an intention to take physical delivery of the gold. ​the deep dive

In the futures market, such large-scale acquisitions with immediate delivery requests are uncommon, as most traders typically roll over or close positions to avoid the logistics of physical settlement. This move suggests a strategic decision by the buyer, possibly aiming to secure substantial gold reserves promptly.

​

This transaction aligns with a broader trend of increased demand for physical gold in the United States. For instance, in February 2025, JPMorgan Chase & Co. delivered gold bullion valued at over $4 billion against futures contracts in New York, reflecting a surge in physical gold acquisitions amid market uncertainties and trade considerations. ​Bloomberg+1MINING.COM+1

Ben Schreckinger at POLITICO has published a revealing and timely article that cuts to the heart of where America’s political tensions are heading. Titled “Trump Protesters Plan to Build ‘Tea Party’ of the Left,” the piece profiles a rising movement among progressive activists who are beginning to reevaluate the effectiveness of street protest—and what comes next.

One of the more eye-opening voices in the piece is Micah White, a veteran of Occupy Wall Street, who now openly concedes what many within activist circles have begun to whisper: traditional protest is broken. In White’s words, “The people cannot attain sovereignty over their governments by collective protest in the streets.” Instead, he lays out two stark options: win elections or win wars.

That binary alone is enough to raise eyebrows in national security circles. The idea that part of the American left may begin splintering into electoral vs. insurrectionist factions echoes the political volatility seen during the 1960s and 1970s. White himself says he supports the electoral route—but his acknowledgment that others will “go down the dark path of ’70s guerrilla insurrection” is chilling.

These words are not just rhetorical flourishes. With domestic extremism already a focus for agencies like the FBI and DHS, public declarations like this may signal an evolving risk landscape. The concern isn't just about fringe groups acting independently, but whether political factions might begin to openly tolerate—or even endorse—extra-political action to achieve their aims.

Iran formally lodged a complaint with the United Nations Security Council on Monday, condemning what it described as “reckless and belligerent” statements made by U.S. President Donald Trump. The complaint referred specifically to Trump's recent remarks in which he threatened Iran with bombing and the imposition of secondary tariffs if Tehran did not comply with demands related to its nuclear program.

In a letter submitted to the Security Council, Iran’s UN Ambassador accused the United States of violating international law and the foundational principles of the UN Charter. The letter emphasized that such rhetoric undermines global peace and stability, calling Trump's threats “a flagrant violation” of diplomatic norms.

The Iranian envoy reiterated that Tehran seeks peaceful engagement but warned that it would not tolerate any form of military aggression. According to the letter, Iran would “decisively act” in self-defense against any direct attack or action by U.S. forces or those of its allied proxies. The statement included a clear warning that the responsibility for any escalation would rest squarely on Washington’s shoulders.

​In a recent interview on "The View," Elie Mystal, a legal analyst and justice correspondent for The Nation, advocated that all laws enacted before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be considered "presumptively unconstitutional." Mystal's argument is based on the premise that prior to this landmark legislation, the United States functioned as an "apartheid country," systematically denying significant portions of its population, particularly African Americans, the right to participate in the democratic process. ​The Daily Caller

He contends that laws established during this period lack legitimacy because they were created without the input or representation of all citizens. Mystal asserts that the disenfranchisement of marginalized groups resulted in a legal framework that did not reflect the will or protect the rights of the entire populace. 

​

This perspective has ignited a robust debate among legal scholars, historians, and political commentators. Supporters of Mystal's view argue that scrutinizing pre-1965 laws is essential to address and rectify systemic inequalities embedded within the legal system. They believe that such an approach is necessary to ensure that contemporary laws uphold principles of equity and justice, viewing the period before the Civil Rights Movement as fundamentally compromised in its legislative legitimacy due to widespread disenfranchisement.

Conversely, critics contend that deeming all laws passed before 1965 as presumptively unconstitutional is overly broad and dismisses the complexity of historical legislation. They point out that not all pre-1965 laws were inherently discriminatory and that many have been foundational to the American legal and constitutional order.

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker is advocating for House Bill 43 (HB-43), legislation that proposes mandatory civil liability insurance for all gun owners in the state. This bill aims to ensure that firearm owners have financial coverage for potential damages resulting from the use of their weapons. Supporters argue that such measures promote responsible gun ownership and provide a financial safety net for victims of gun-related incidents.

​

However, opponents contend that HB-43 imposes undue financial burdens on law-abiding gun owners and may infringe upon Second Amendment rights. They argue that mandatory insurance requirements could disproportionately affect individuals of lower socioeconomic status, potentially limiting their ability to legally own firearms. Critics also question the effectiveness of the bill in preventing gun violence, suggesting that it penalizes responsible gun owners rather than addressing the root causes of firearm-related crimes.

​

In response to the proposed legislation, various advocacy groups and concerned citizens have initiated petitions to oppose HB-43. These petitions aim to mobilize public opinion and influence lawmakers to reconsider the bill. Individuals interested in participating in these efforts are encouraged to research and engage with reputable organizations aligned with their views on the matter.

This also collected fallout from a recent "fog" event which sickened a lot of people.

We were able to examine the samples both under the microscope and also via ICP-MS (mass spec analysis) for heavy metals. The results are absolutely shocking, even horrifying, and I'm not one to be easily rattled by low levels of metals.

What I'm seeing in these results is truly disturbing, finding both biological life forms of some kind, and also then crazy high levels of toxic metals, including ridiculous levels of aluminum falling out of the sky. Beginning today and all this week, I will be sharing with you some of the microscopy photos, the lab tests, the interview clips and more.

Recent discussions have emerged regarding potential insider trading activities involving former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her husband, Paul Pelosi. 

In September 2024, former President Donald Trump publicly called for Nancy Pelosi's prosecution, alleging that Paul Pelosi engaged in insider trading by selling significant shares of Visa stock shortly before the Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit against the company. Specifically, Paul Pelosi sold between $500,000 and $1 million worth of Visa stock on July 1, 2024, approximately three months before the lawsuit was announced. Trump suggested that Nancy Pelosi had prior knowledge of the impending legal action and informed her husband accordingly. A spokesperson for Nancy Pelosi denied these allegations, stating she had no involvement in or prior knowledge of her husband's transactions. ​WSJ+4New York Post+4New York Post+4New York Post+1New York Post+1

Additionally, reports indicate that Paul Pelosi executed stock trades totaling $38 million in the weeks leading up to President Trump's inauguration. Notably, he sold $24 million in Apple shares and $5 million in Nvidia shares. He also purchased $100,000 worth of call options in Tempus AI, which experienced a 60% surge in stock value following the disclosure of his investment. These transactions have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the appearance of profiting from non-public information. Nancy Pelosi has consistently maintained that she does not own any stocks and is not involved in her husband's investment decisions. ​New York Post+1New York Post+1Ballard Spahr | National Law Firm+2New York Post+2New York Post+2