SEPTEMBER 2026
🍂🍁🍂
See all News Shorts here.
RE-Broadcast of The Meeting of Informed Minds
ARE YOU READY TO GET INFORMED?
Here is the RE-Broadcast of the show
JOIN THE UNKNOWN PATRIOT REBEL AND THE BRUTAL TRUTH FOR AN INFORMATIVE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE TOPICS THAT MATTER, THAT CHANGE OUR DAILY LIVES AND NOT ALWAYS FOR THE BETTER.
LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, GET NOTIFICATIONS AND SHARE:
https://rumble.com/v7f0sxy-live-7pm-ct-8pm-et-tonight-for-the-meeting-of-the-informed-minds.html
Plymouth Clancy Mistrial: The Holdout, the Hung Jury, and What the Law Actually Requires
It’s another case of “What’s BAD is GOOD.” How can this woman POSSIBLY be INNOCENT?
One juror stood in the way of a verdict in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. That is what the defense said. That is what the jury foreperson’s notes were said to show.
The trial ended Friday, September 4, 2026, in a mistrial. There is no not guilty verdict. There is no guilty verdict. There are three dead children and an unresolved murder case.
She (Clancy) does not deny that she killed them. The fight in court was never about who did it. The fight was about whether she had criminal responsibility when she did it.
Lindsay Clancy, 36, a former labor and delivery nurse from Duxbury, Massachusetts, is charged with three counts of first degree murder. In January 2023 she strangled her children Cora, age 5, Dawson, age 3, and Callan, age 8 months, with exercise bands in the family home while her husband was out. She then jumped from a window in a suicide attempt and survived with serious injuries.
Massachusetts law does not treat “I was sick” as a magic pass.
The test is whether, because of mental disease or defect, she lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of her conduct or to conform her conduct to the law. The defense said postpartum psychosis took that capacity away. The prosecution said she planned the killings, sent her husband out of the house, acted with purpose, and knew right from wrong. Those two accounts cannot both be true in the way the law requires. A jury of nine women and three men heard more than eighty witnesses over about five weeks and then sat for roughly thirty eight to forty hours across seven days. They still could not agree.
In a serious criminal case in the United States, all twelve jurors must agree. That rule was locked in by the Supreme Court in 2020. Eleven votes is not a verdict.
Ten votes is not a verdict. One holdout is enough to stop the machine. That is by design. It is also why a single person can leave a courtroom with no answer after weeks of evidence.
On Thursday the jury foreperson sent notes that the defense treated as an 11 to 1 split for a finding that Clancy was not criminally responsible. Attorney Kevin Reddington told the judge one juror had admitted doubt and then refused to apply the reasonable doubt instruction. He asked Judge William Sullivan to remove that juror. Sullivan refused. He said he would not pick a side inside the jury room. He questioned jurors one by one. He sent them back. He did not dump the holdout. That choice was the legally safer one. It was also the choice that left the case hanging.
No one outside that room has the full transcript of what was said in deliberations. The actual notes were not dumped in public word for word. Reddington’s version is the loudest version. Prosecutors said there was no clean way to prove who was right about the law and who was not.
A judge who removes a juror because the majority is angry at the minority is a judge who is steering a verdict. Courts treat that as dangerous for a reason. A holdout can be stubborn. A holdout can also be the only person still applying the burden of proof the way the instructions require. You cannot know which one you had from press conferences.
On Friday the panel sent another note. It said, with a heavy heart, they could not reach a unanimous decision and would not be able to.
Reddington tried an emergency appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to stop the mistrial and keep pressing the holdout issue. The higher court said no. Sullivan then declared a mistrial. That is the official result. Not an acquittal. Not a conviction. A hung jury.
A hung jury does not prove Clancy was insane. It does not prove she was sane. It proves twelve people could not all accept one legal conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt. Hung juries are uncommon. Experts put them at about one in twenty criminal cases. They happen more in long, high heat trials packed with expert fighting over a defendant’s mind. This was that kind of trial. The judge had already given the so called dynamite charge, the extra push that tells jurors to keep trying. It did not break the wall.
Cora, Dawson, and Callan were killed in their home by their mother. Any honest report starts there. Mental illness can be real. Postpartum psychosis exists. It is rare. It can include delusions and a break from reality. None of that erases the act. None of that forces a jury to accept the defense theory.
The prosecution’s job was to prove criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt.
If eleven jurors thought the state failed and one juror thought the state did not fail, the law still requires all twelve. That is the cost of the unanimity rule. It protects defendants from a rush to convict. It also blocks a rush to excuse.
Reddington later said the other jurors were robbed by one man with an agenda. That is a lawyer talking after he lost the chance at a directed result.
District Attorney Timothy Cruz said the case has always been about the three children and that no decision on a retrial would be made on the spot. Both statements serve a side. The court record is colder. The jury said it was done. The judge accepted that. The charges remain. Clancy stays held at Tewksbury State Hospital without bail. A status hearing is set for September 29, 2026.
Cruz can retry the case with a new jury. He can drop or reduce charges. He can talk plea. A retrial means another long fight in a case the public already knows too well. Jury selection will be harder. Witnesses will be older in the record and the same on the facts.
If prosecutors walk away from a criminal retrial, civil commitment can still keep her locked in a hospital if she is found to be a danger. An insanity win at trial would not have meant she walks out the door and goes home. It would have meant hospital control instead of a prison sentence. People who talk as if a not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility finding is freedom are not telling the truth.
The holdout fight exposed a hard fact about American criminal law. The system would rather end with no verdict than force a verdict by cutting out the person who will not sign. That can look weak when eleven people want to move. It can look necessary when the state is asking a jury to decide a mother’s mind on the day she killed her kids. Sullivan chose not to convert a disagreement into a one sided win for the defense.
The Supreme Judicial Court let that stand. Anyone who wanted a clean not guilty stamp did not get one. Anyone who wanted a murder conviction did not get one either.
Public talk about this case often splits into two camps that refuse to hear each other.
One camp treats Clancy as a victim of a medical system that failed her and treats any holdout as cruelty. The other camp treats the mental health claim as a story used to dodge the plain fact of three strangled children. Both camps skip the legal question the jury was actually given.
The question was not “Did she suffer?” The question was not “Are the children dead?” The question was whether the Commonwealth proved she was criminally responsible under Massachusetts law. After forty hours, twelve people could not all say yes or all say no.
If there is a second trial …and there will be, the same evidence will be back in front of new strangers.
The same experts will argue about psychosis, planning, medication, and what Clancy understood in those minutes. The same photos and the same timeline will be on the table. A different twelve may lock in. They may split again. The law will still demand every vote. One person will still have the power to stop the rest. That is the rule that just ended this trial with no answer.
Address links:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/04/us/lindsay-clancy-trial-unanimous-verdicts.html
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/09/04/us/lindsay-clancy-trial-deadlock
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/03/us/live-news/lindsay-clancy-trial
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/04/us/live-news/lindsay-clancy-trial
https://www.wbur.org/news/2026/09/04/lindsay-clancy-murder-trial-verdict-massachusetts
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/lindsay-clancy-trial-case-updates-jury-verdict-mistrial/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/09/04/metro/lindsay-clancy-trial-live-updates/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/09/03/metro/jury-deliberations-holdout-juror/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpwlrj2je1po
https://apnews.com/live/lindsay-clancy-trial-09-04-2026
https://www.newsweek.com/lindsay-clancy-verdict-judges-jury-actions-may-be-dangerous-expert-12402400
https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/why-the-lindsay-clancy-trial-ended-in-a-deadlock
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/whats-next-lindsay-clancy-after-mistrial-2026-09-04/
It’s another case of “What’s BAD is GOOD.” How can this woman POSSIBLY be INNOCENT?
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #ClancyMistrial #OneJurorHoldout #NoVerdictNoClosure
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Meta’s $18 Billion Child Safety Deal Still Rests on Age Checks That Miss Kids and Tag Adults
Time caps and night blocks only work if the company can tell children from adults.
Meta agreed in late August 2026 to pay up to about $18 billion and change how teenagers use Facebook and Instagram.
The deal ended a federal trial in Oakland after states said the company built products that hooked young users and hid the mental health risks.
Meta did not admit it did anything wrong. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers signed off on the pact. Florida refused to join and called the money peanuts. New Mexico stayed out because it had already won its own case.
The main pot is about $16.7 billion for 47 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Texas took a separate $1 billion deal. That is how the total gets sold as nearly $18 billion. About 70 percent, or $12.7 billion, is set to go out over 10 years. The other 30 percent, about $5.3 billion, only pays if YouTube and TikTok accept similar time limits, night blocks, and age checks and also pay matching money. Meta booked a legal expense of about $10 billion for the third quarter of 2026. The company took in more than $200 billion in revenue in 2025. This is a large check. It is not a company ending check.
States get money they can spend on youth online safety programs or other priorities. California is in line for $1.5 billion to $2.1 billion. Other states get hundreds of millions over a decade. That is why attorneys general called it historic. Money to state offices is not the same thing as proof that a teenager in a bedroom will be safer next month. The rules only bite if Meta can tell who is under 18 and who is not. That is the weak joint in the whole machine.
The product rules look strict on paper. Users Meta treats as ages 13 to 17 get a default two hour daily cap across Facebook and Instagram. Time on both apps counts together, including if Meta links multiple accounts. Only a parent can raise that cap. Night mode blocks the feed, Stories, Explore, and Reels from midnight to 6 a.m. School mode mutes most push alerts from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Night alerts are also muted from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. unless a parent turns that off. Teens get nag screens after 15 minutes of continuous use and again at 60 and 90 minutes. Like counts are hidden by default. Extreme makeup and cosmetic surgery filters are blocked. Teens can pick a feed that is not driven by the recommendation engine. Direct messages sit outside the time and night blocks.
Those limits last for years, but the tightest time and night rules start as a five year promise. If rival apps sign on, the daily cap can drop to one hour per app and the night block can stretch from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. for 10 years.
Meta is already running newspaper ads telling TikTok and YouTube to copy the plan. A large slice of Meta’s own payout depends on those rivals playing along. Teens who hit a wall on Instagram can still open another app.
None of this works if a 14 year old signs up as a 25 year old. The settlement therefore demands stronger age assurance and an independent auditor with wide access. Some filings say the age system must be independently tested and keep false positives no higher than 10 percent for users ages 16 to 17 and 3 percent for users ages 13 to 15. Users who claim they are over 18 but skip the age test for two weeks face extra limits meant to keep suspicious adults away from teens. Meta must also try to link accounts owned by one person so kids cannot dodge the clock with a second profile.
Read the fine print. The settlement doesn’t order Meta to demand a government ID or a video selfie from every user. Reuters reported that the text stops short of those hard checks. Meta has long used softer clues instead: birthday posts, school grade talk, friend graphs, and reports from other users. For kids under 13, the deal pushes extra steps, including searches of friend networks to find and kill those accounts. The company may temporarily use data from children it has already flagged to train an AI model that hunts more under 13 accounts later.
Meta is not starting from zero. It already asks for an ID or a Yoti face age estimate when a user tries to change a birthday from under 18 to over 18, or when an account is flagged as too young.
In 2026 it rolled out AI that scans photos and videos for visual cues such as height and bone structure. Yoti is a British digital identity company. Meta uses one of its products as an age check vendor. It’s not a government agency and not a Meta app. When Instagram or Facebook doubts your age, it can send you to Yoti instead of, or as well as, asking for a government ID.
Meta says this is not facial recognition because it does not name the person in the frame. It still looks at faces and bodies at scale. If the system decides an account may belong to a child, the account can be shut down until the owner proves an age. Proof often means an ID or a face tool. Behavioral monitoring plus visual analysis plus ID on appeal is the real stack, even if the court order never uses those words for every login.
Experts have been blunt that this stack is not ready to police hundreds of millions of accounts. Syracuse professor Alexis Ingber said the design changes look good on paper but rest on age technology that has failed in the main. Age estimation is an estimate. Best test numbers still miss by more than a year for many people. Error rates rise for women and for people who are not white. Teens near 17 and adults near 18 sit in the worst zone. Kids have already fooled face tools with video game faces and cheap disguises. A system that is wrong 3 to 10 percent of the time, applied to a huge user base, will lock out real adults and leave real minors inside.
Privacy cost is not a side issue. It is the price of the enforcement plan. Government IDs, face images, and long running behavior logs are high value targets. Faces and fingerprints do not reset like a password. Third party age vendors have already leaked records.
A Discord related breach exposed tens of thousands of government ID images and personal details from people who uploaded papers after a face check flagged them. Academic reviews of U.S. age gates found low compliance, easy bypass, and extra sharing of user data with other companies that handle location, cards, or document checks. Every adult who only wants to open Facebook can get pulled into that pipeline if the model guesses wrong.
Meta points at Apple and Google. It wants app stores to verify age and get parent approval before a teen downloads an app, then pass a clean age signal to developers. That would shift the checkpoint off Meta’s login screen and onto the phone store. It would also put government style identity checks closer to the gate of the entire app economy. Device makers have their own legal and product reasons not to become the nation’s age police. Until that happens, Meta is left with profiling, visual scans, user reports, and selective ID demands. That mix is exactly what privacy lawyers say creates identity theft risk without a clean record of catching every child.
The legal background matters. The 1998 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act makes companies liable if they collect personal data from kids under 13 without a parent. Meta has argued that the same law makes hard ID and biometric collection dangerous. Child safety advocates say firms hide behind that law so they can keep young users. The Federal Trade Commission said it would not punish firms that collect data only to check age. States can still enforce their own versions of the rule. The settlement tries to walk that line: more hunting for underage accounts, more AI training on flagged child data, no blanket ID wall for every adult. That is a policy choice, not a solved engineering problem.
What the public is being sold is protection of minors. What the public is actually getting is a 10 year experiment that sorts people by guesswork and then restricts the ones the guess labels as young.
Adults who fail a face estimate or skip a test can land in a locked down feed. Minors who lie well enough can keep the old product. Messaging stays open at night. Rival apps may never join, which would shrink both the cash and the tighter time rules. Florida’s refusal is a reminder that not every state thinks the terms match the harm alleged in court. Meta keeps its platforms, avoids a verdict, and still gets to tell the country it is investing in stronger technology.
Parents who want less phone time for their kids can use the new default caps if Meta tags the account as a teen in the first place. Schools may see fewer midday pings. Predators lose some easy paths if private defaults and stranger blocks hold. Those are concrete gains.
A settlement this large still depends on age tools that researchers, civil liberties groups, and even Meta’s own history show are leaky, biased, and hungry for sensitive records.
Anyone who uses Facebook or Instagram should treat the next wave of “prove your age” prompts as a data event, not a minor pop up.
The bill is huge. The lock on the door is not.
Address links:
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/26/tech/meta-states-settle-trial-children
https://www.theverge.com/policy/985032/meta-state-ag-kids-online-safety-settlement
https://about.fb.com/news/2026/08/agreement-with-state-attorneys-general-supporting-teens/
https://about.fb.com/news/2026/05/ai-age-assurance-teens/
https://www.eff.org/pages/does-tech-even-workhttps://kgi.georgetown.edu/research-and-commentary/age-assurance-online/
https://apnews.com/article/meta-trial-instagram-settlement-97d342f2a33d835eda2356c5e1af9e37
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #MetaSettlement #AgeChecksFail #PrivacyNotOptional
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
CEO of Pfizer Being Questioned After a World Economic Forum Meeting
This video has now been BANNED on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube.
The WEF wants it scrubbed, and their lackeys are happy to oblige.
https://1hebrutaltruth1.substack.com/p/ceo-of-pfizer-being-questioned-after
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #wef #scandemic #covidshots
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth AUG 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Latest US/Iran War Update
As of August 31, 2026, the U.S.–Iran war (now about six months old) flared again after a roughly one-month lull. Fighting is still limited compared with the heaviest earlier phases, but both sides traded strikes over the last 48 hours and President Trump said more U.S. action is coming.
What just happened
-
Sunday, Aug. 30: The U.S. struck two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz. CENTCOM said IRGC forces were preparing to launch rockets with sea mines into the strait. Iran said the strike killed two or three and wounded others. It was the first disclosed U.S. strike on Iran since late July. ms.now
The United States hit two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday August 30. American commanders said the Revolutionary Guard was getting ready to fire rockets carrying sea mines into that waterway. Iran said two or three of its people died and others got hurt. That was the first strike Washington publicly admitted since late July.
It was a shot at hardware sitting on an island that sits on one of the most important oil routes on earth. Both sides already spent six months trading blows and then talking like they might stop. Then the launchers went up and the planes came in. That is the whole story on that day. One side said mines were coming. The other side said people died. The strait stayed the prize.
-
Monday, Aug. 31: Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they fired ballistic missiles at U.S. bases in Jordan (King Hussein and Al Azraq) and targeted U.S. personnel at a base in the UAE. Jordan said it intercepted eight missiles. U.S. sources said there was no significant damage and no new U.S. deaths reported from that barrage. Iran also claimed mines hit a tanker in the strait; the U.S. denied that.
jinsa.org
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said on Monday August 31 they shot ballistic missiles at American bases in Jordan named King Hussein and Al Azraq and also went after American troops at a base in the UAE. Jordan said it knocked down eight missiles. American sources said the bases were not badly hit and no new American deaths came from that attack. Iran also said mines struck a tanker in the strait. The United States said that did not happen.
That’s the payback shot after the American strike on Larak Island the day before. Iran fired. Jordan stopped most of it. Washington said the damage was small and nobody new died. Then both sides argued about a tanker. Same fight as always. Missiles in the air. Claims on paper. The waterway still sitting in the middle of it.
-
Trump’s response: In a Fox News interview Monday he said the U.S. will “hit them hard” and “there will be a response.” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said more war is not in Iran’s interest and talked up dialogue the same day.
cbsnews.com
Donald Trump told Fox News on Monday the United States will hit Iran hard and there will be a response. That came after Iran fired at American bases. Same day Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said more war is not good for Iran and he talked about talking instead.
Trump said the United States will hit Iran hard. Pezeshkian said more war is a bad deal and he wants talks. That’s the split after six months. One capital is promising the next strike. The other is asking for words, but we’ve heard that before.. Still no deal.
How we got here (short version)
The war began February 28, 2026, with coordinated U.S.–Israeli strikes on Iran. Trump initially said it would last weeks. A June 17 memorandum of understanding with Pezeshkian to wind down fighting and reopen Hormuz later collapsed; Trump declared it “over” in early July. After more tit-for-tat strikes, both sides largely paused kinetic attacks for about a month while Washington emphasized sanctions and economic pressure.
The Aug. 30–31 exchange broke that pause.
The core fight is still over the Strait of Hormuz (normally ~20% of seaborne oil). The U.S. says it has cleared mines from international lanes and loosened Iran’s grip; Iran still claims control and has been talking with Oman about a corridor. Oil is elevated (Brent around $90). jinsa.org
Casualties and cost (reported figures)
-
U.S.: About 18 killed and 750+ wounded in published tallies (figures have been revised over time). No new U.S. death was reported from today’s Jordan/UAE attacks. Cost estimates cited in recent reporting are in the tens of billions.
globalsecurity.org
-
Iran: Thousands dead in various compilations (Iranian and independent tallies differ widely; civilian and military numbers are disputed). Leadership changes followed the opening strikes, including the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei early in the war.
What to watch next
Trump has threatened further strikes. Pezeshkian is at a Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit and is expected to see Putin and Xi. Congress has been wrestling with war funding. Neither side has a signed, durable ceasefire. Commercial airline and oil-market risk remains high while Hormuz stays contested.
This is a live conflict; claims from both governments about damage, mines, and “who started this round” should be treated as competing accounts until more independent confirmation.
Israel’s not flying in this latest Hormuz round. The August 30 strike on Larak Island and Iran’s August 31 shots at U.S. bases in Jordan and the UAE were a U.S.–Iran exchange. Reporting through August 31 says Israel conducted no new operations against Iran in that window.
Israel started this war with the United States on February 28, and then got pulled back when Trump wanted negotiated talks, and has mostly watched the Hormuz fight from the sidelines since.
What Israel is doing instead
Standing off Iran, for now. After Trump told Netanyahu to hold fire during earlier flare-ups, Israeli jets haven’t been part of the recent U.S. hits on launchers and mines. Israeli officials have said they want to hit Iranian energy targets; Washington has blocked that because it fears Iran would smash Gulf oil infrastructure and spike prices. jewishvirtuallibrary.org
Warning it will go back in. Energy Minister Eli Cohen said this week Israeli intelligence thinks the joint campaign set Iran’s nuclear program back two to four years, and that if Iran tries to rebuild nukes or ballistic missiles, “even if there is an agreement with the United States, we will be there to attack.” That is Israel’s standing veto over any U.S.–Iran deal. globalsecurity.org
Still fighting on other fronts. While the U.S. and Iran traded shots over Hormuz, Israel kept operating in Gaza, southern Lebanon (Hezbollah / security zone), the West Bank, and Syria (including strikes aimed at blocking a Turkish footprint). Defense Minister Israel Katz has said Israel will stay on Mount Hermon and in the Syrian buffer as long as it sees a jihadist threat. Israel is still moving forward with their “Greater Israel Project.” jinsa.org
Security and politics at home. Shin Bet just pulled Yair Netanyahu back to Israel after what it called a serious threat. Netanyahu says Iran tried to kill one of his sons. Gas prices in Israel are at record highs because of the war. A large Greece defense deal was announced August 31. Knesset elections are in the background. jinsa.org
Did Iran put out a contract for the assassination of Baron Trump?
There is a reported TV bounty video.
But its not confirmed as an independently verified Iranian government “contract” that has been shown to be an active hit job.
Late last week, Iranian state-linked TV (reported as Channel 3 / IRIB, with IRGC-tied media in the mix) aired a short propaganda clip titled something like “Where to kill Barron Trump?” It claimed his movements were watched and that a $10 million reward was on offer.
Iran International first pushed the clip; outlets including Reuters, CNN, Politico, and the Times of Israel repeated it. The U.S. Secret Service said it is aware of the video and looks at anything that can be seen as a threat. It would not discuss protective details. reuters.com
What has not been proven in public:
-
That the $10 million is a real funded contract with a named payer
-
That an Iranian team is actually in place
-
That the “surveillance” in the video is real (it used crude graphics and some names that look fake)
Iran’s security chief Mohsen Rezaei later called reports of a plot a lie and blamed Netanyahu for using the story. That denial doesn’t erase the broadcast. State TV in Iran isn’t independent. Airing a bounty clip is still a threat, even if officials later say there is no plot. Analysts have treated it as psychological warfare mixed with real risk, not as courtroom-proof of a signed contract. m.economictimes.com
Iran’s state media put out a video that offered money for Barron Trump’s death. Secret Service is treating it as a threat. A verified operational contract has not been shown. Iran’s own security chief denied an actual plot.
Still wired into the U.S. war machine. Even when Israeli planes are not bombing Iran this week, the alliance is tight: U.S. aircraft in Israel, shared targeting data, tankers refueling Israeli jets, joint lessons-learned meetings between air chiefs. Israel wants regime change. Trump wants Iran to change behavior and reopen Hormuz cheaply before midterms. That gap is why Israel is a partner that is also a bystander. cfr.org
The Brutal Truth Is…
Israel helped open this war with America. Now it wants a harder finish than Washington will take. Israeli planes are not in the Larak hit or the Jordan shots today. That fight is America and Iran. Jerusalem sits it out and still claims the last word on Iranian bombs.
While those two trade fire over the strait, Israel holds the line in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza.
It tells Tehran the nuclear file is still Israeli business even if Trump cuts a deal. That’s the split. America wants the oil moving. Israel wants the threat dead. US in the water. Israel on the ground and it won’t let go.
Related address links for the Aug 30–31 U.S.–Iran flare-up and Israel’s role:U.S. strike on Larak Island (Aug 30)
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-forces-strike-two-iranian-launchers-irans-larak-island-us-official-says-2026-08-30/
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/30/us-strikes-irans-larak-island-01056585
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/08/30/us-strikes-iran-missile-sites-larak-island/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/30/us-strikes-iranian-launchers-on-larak-island-amid-strait-of-hormuz-tensions
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2026/08/30/us-iran-war-larak-island-iran-war/91539747007/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Larak_Island_attack
Iran response / Jordan and UAE bases (Aug 31)
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2026/08/latest-developments-us-iran-war-1
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/aug/31/us-iran-israel-hormuz-oil-donald-trump-larak-kharg-island-uae-jordan-latest-news-updates
https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/iran-war-us-strikes-strait-of-hormuz-larak-island/
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/30/us-strikes-irans-lark-island-in-first-attack-in-weeks
Trump / Pezeshkian statements
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/31/trump-threatens-further-action-us-iran-exchange-fire
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2026/08/president-says-more-war-not-irans-interest-after-fighting-flares
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/8/26/trump-tells-al-jazeera-not-in-a-hurry-for-iran-to-return-to-talks
Israel posture while this is happening
https://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/2026-us-israel-war-with-iran/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-remains-on-sidelines-of-us-iran-fight-which-for-jerusalem-is-just-fine-for-now/
https://www.cfr.org/articles/the-iran-war-at-six-months-a-region-and-its-relationship-with-the-u-s-transformed
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israels-netanyahu-says-iran-tried-to-kill-one-of-his-sons-2026-08-24/
https://jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Iran-War-Update-8.31.26.pdf
Six month war context / Hormuz
https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-war-six-months-anniversary-israel-3c4d33b09fdbe19928781c678aa025c9
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2026/aug/28/how-the-iran-war-unfolded-every-attack-and-oil-price-change-visualised
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/28/after-six-months-of-war-what-have-us-iran-gained-and-lost
https://english.news.cn/20260828/234c5a4a5ddc4c9eb4e45bf445bc3ddc/c.html
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-war-oprep.htm
Live / topic hubs
https://www.theguardian.com/world/us-israel-war-on-iran
https://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/strait-of-hormuz/
https://www.c-span.org/Iran
Additional address links on Rezaei, the Barron Trump video, and the Secret Service response:Mohsen Rezaei / security post
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/09/world/middleeast/iran-security-council-guards-commander.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/mohsen-rezaei-appointed-secretary-irans-top-security-body-2026-08-10/
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/who-is-irans-mohsen-rezaei-hardliner-appointed-key-security-role-2026-08-10/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_National_Security_Council
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_of_the_Supreme_National_Security_Council
https://shafaq.com/en/Middle-East/Rezaei-named-Supreme-Leader-s-representative-to-security-council
https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/iran-war-mojtaba-khamenei-hard-liners-rezaei-taeb-us-tensions-ptag-2982385-2026-08-29
Barron Trump video / $10 million claim
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-906386
https://www.timesofisrael.com/where-to-kill-barron-trump-iran-said-to-put-10-million-bounty-on-us-presidents-son/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/world/4698147/iran-propaganda-video-barron-trump-assassination/
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/iran-media-claims-barron-trump-has-10-million-bounty-on-his-head-and-is-being-monitored-in-chilling-video/
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/iranian-state-media-targets-barron-trump-video-1816064
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-906753
Secret Service / official U.S. reaction
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-secret-service-aware-iranian-video-threat-against-barron-trump-2026-08-25/
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/iran-barron-trump-threat-intl-hnk
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/25/secret-service-iran-barron-trump-threat-01049014
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/25/secret-service-says-it-is-aware-iranian-state-media-video-threatening-barron-trump/
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/secret-service-confirms-awareness-of-iranian-state-media-video-threatening-barron-trumps-life
Rezaei denial of a plot
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/iranian-security-chief-denies-potential-plot-to-assassinate-trumps-son/
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/432358
https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/irans-security-chief-denies-report-of-assassination-plot-against-trumps-son-barron/articleshow/133581820.cms
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #StraitOfHormuz #IranWar #LarakIsland
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth AUG 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
