SEPTEMBER 2026
🍂🍁🍂
See all News Shorts here.
RE-Broadcast of The Meeting of Informed Minds
ARE YOU READY TO GET INFORMED?
Here is the RE-Broadcast of the show
JOIN THE UNKNOWN PATRIOT REBEL AND THE BRUTAL TRUTH FOR AN INFORMATIVE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE TOPICS THAT MATTER, THAT CHANGE OUR DAILY LIVES AND NOT ALWAYS FOR THE BETTER.
LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, GET NOTIFICATIONS AND SHARE:
The corrected times for the live shows are 8:pm ct 9:pm et
https://rumble.com/v7f0sxy-live-7pm-ct-8pm-et-tonight-for-the-meeting-of-the-informed-minds.html
Green Cards, Government Benefits and the New Federal Immigration Test
Trump’s New Public Charge Rule Takes Effect as States Take the Administration to Court
A major change to how the federal government evaluates certain immigrants seeking lawful permanent residence took effect September 18, 2026.
The Department of Homeland Security has rescinded the public charge regulations adopted in 2022 and restored a broader discretionary approach that allows immigration officers to consider a wider range of circumstances when determining whether certain applicants are likely to become a public charge.
At the same time, a coalition of states, the District of Columbia, counties, and major cities has taken the administration to federal court. The lawsuits do not mean the rule has been overturned. They are challenges to the legality of the regulation, and as of September 19, 2026, the rule remains in effect.
What changed on September 18
The underlying public charge law is not new. Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act has long allowed the federal government to determine whether certain people seeking admission or adjustment of status are likely to become a public charge. The significant change is how DHS has chosen to interpret and apply that authority.
The 2022 regulations established specific definitions and limitations on which public benefits could be considered. The new rule rescinds that regulatory framework. DHS says the 2022 approach restricted officers too much and prevented them from considering all relevant facts surrounding an applicant’s circumstances.
Under the restored framework, USCIS officers have broader discretion to examine an applicant’s overall financial circumstances. That can include the applicant’s age, health, family situation, financial resources, education and skills, employment prospects, assets, liabilities, and potential use of certain public benefits.
The important point is that receiving a particular benefit does not automatically mean an applicant will be denied a green card. The rule operates through a broader assessment of whether the applicant is likely to become a public charge. The federal government therefore retains substantial room to evaluate individual circumstances rather than applying one simple automatic disqualification.
Public benefits now matter more
The practical difference is significant because the previous regulatory framework limited the benefits that could be considered in a public charge determination. The new framework allows DHS officers to consider means tested public benefits more broadly when evaluating an applicant.
Programs identified in litigation surrounding the rule include Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, housing assistance, and other means tested benefits. The legal disputes also concern benefits received by certain family members whom an applicant is legally obligated to support.
That does not mean every immigrant receiving Medicaid, food assistance, or housing assistance automatically becomes ineligible for permanent residence. The determination remains individualized. The significance of the new rule is that those circumstances can now carry greater weight in the officer’s overall assessment than they did under the 2022 regulatory framework.
The rule also draws an important line based on timing. DHS stated that applications for admission made on or after September 18, 2026, and adjustment of status applications postmarked or electronically submitted on or after that date, fall under the new framework. Benefits received before September 18 are treated under the earlier regulatory framework.
The green card issue is more precise than the headline suggests
Much of the public discussion describes the policy simply as a new rule that allows the government to deny visas or green cards because an immigrant uses government assistance. That description leaves out an important legal distinction.
The DHS regulation directly addresses the public charge ground of inadmissibility and specifically establishes how DHS handles applications for admission and adjustment of status. Adjustment of status is the process through which an eligible person already in the United States seeks lawful permanent resident status.
Consular visa processing is a separate process administered by the Department of State. The State Department already has its own public charge framework and has separately taken steps concerning public charge screening and immigrant visa applicants. The DHS regulation should therefore not be described as though it simply creates one identical standard for every visa applicant around the world.
That distinction matters because immigration cases can move through very different legal channels. Someone applying for adjustment of status inside the United States can face a different adjudication process from someone applying for an immigrant visa through a U.S. consulate overseas.
The administration’s argument
The Trump administration says the rule is intended to restore what it considers the proper statutory standard and reinforce the expectation that immigrants should be capable of supporting themselves rather than becoming dependent on government assistance.
DHS specifically argues that the 2022 regulations were too restrictive and inconsistent with congressional intent. The agency says restoring broader discretion will allow officers to make more complete and accurate determinations based on the total circumstances of each applicant.
The administration is therefore not presenting the rule as a categorical prohibition on public assistance. Its legal position is that federal immigration law already contains the public charge standard and that DHS has authority to determine how the standard should be implemented within the limits established by Congress.
The legal challenge
Opponents are attacking the regulation on a different question. Their central argument is that DHS went beyond what Congress authorized and improperly transformed a historically narrow public charge standard into a much broader system capable of penalizing lawful use of public benefits.
New York Attorney General Letitia James announced a lawsuit on September 14 on behalf of a coalition of 21 other states and the District of Columbia. Pennsylvania’s governor also joined the action in his official capacity. The coalition argues that the new regulation violates the Administrative Procedure Act and exceeds DHS authority under federal immigration law.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta separately described the lawsuit as challenging what the coalition considers a fundamental expansion of the government’s ability to use lawful benefit participation against immigrants seeking permanent residency. The coalition argues that the regulation conflicts with longstanding interpretations of the public charge provision.
The states are not the only plaintiffs. New York City, Chicago, San Francisco, Santa Clara County, Seattle, and King County have also challenged the policy in federal court. Their case focuses in part on the claimed consequences for local governments and public programs.
A third lawsuit was filed September 17 by Make the Road New York, the New York Legal Assistance Group, the Association to Benefit Children, and African Communities Together. The organizations are represented by the Legal Aid Society, Democracy Forward, and the Center for Constitutional Rights. Their lawsuit seeks to have the new rule vacated.
The courts have not yet settled the dispute
This point deserves particular attention because headlines about lawsuits can easily create the impression that a policy has already been stopped.
It has not.
The lawsuits challenge the rule, but filing a lawsuit does not automatically suspend a federal regulation. Available reporting and case information as of September 19 indicate that the new rule remains operational and that no court order had stopped its implementation.
The next major legal questions will concern whether the plaintiffs obtain emergency relief and whether a federal judge ultimately concludes that DHS acted within its statutory authority.
Even if a judge temporarily blocks the rule, that would not necessarily resolve the underlying case. A temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction would address implementation while the broader legal questions continue through litigation.
Why the Administrative Procedure Act matters
The lawsuits rely heavily on the Administrative Procedure Act. The APA governs how federal agencies create and administer regulations and provides mechanisms for courts to review agency actions.
The plaintiffs argue that DHS acted unlawfully by adopting a standard they believe conflicts with the Immigration and Nationality Act. They also challenge the agency’s reasoning and the way the new framework was developed.
DHS, by contrast, argues that Congress gave immigration officials substantial authority to determine whether someone is likely to become a public charge and that the new regulation simply restores a broader interpretation of that authority.
The dispute is therefore not merely about whether public benefits are desirable or undesirable. The core legal question is how much authority Congress gave DHS and how far an executive agency may go when interpreting an existing immigration statute.
Families with mixed immigration status could feel the effects
Another complicated issue involves households in which immigration status differs among family members.
A household can contain people with different legal statuses, including U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, temporary visa holders, and people seeking permanent residence. A benefit received by one person does not automatically mean every person in that household is subject to a public charge determination.
The new policy nevertheless raises questions when an applicant is legally responsible for supporting another person or when the financial circumstances of the household are relevant to the applicant’s overall situation. Those questions are part of the reason opponents argue that the rule could influence decisions far beyond the individual receiving a benefit.
Critics also argue that uncertainty could cause eligible families to stop using benefits even when the person receiving assistance is not personally subject to a public charge determination. The administration disputes the broader policy implications and maintains that the purpose is to prevent immigration benefits from creating incentives for dependence on public assistance.
The issue of government benefits is therefore more complicated than simply counting the number of immigrants who receive assistance.
The rule does not change eligibility for public benefits
Another distinction is frequently lost in political arguments about the policy.
The public charge regulation is an immigration rule. It does not by itself rewrite every federal or state program that determines who qualifies for Medicaid, SNAP, housing assistance, school meals, or other benefits.
An individual’s eligibility for a benefit and the immigration consequences of receiving that benefit are separate legal questions.
The new rule changes how certain benefit use and financial circumstances can be considered during specified immigration determinations. It does not automatically make every public benefit unavailable to every noncitizen.
That distinction is important because otherwise the policy can easily be misunderstood as either a universal ban on benefits for immigrants or, at the opposite extreme, a rule that has no practical effect on benefit recipients.
Both descriptions would be incomplete.
The administration also revised the I 485 process
The policy change is accompanied by changes to USCIS processing. USCIS announced that a revised edition of Form I 485 would be required for adjustment of status applications submitted on or after the effective date.
The filing date matters. DHS expressly tied the new rule to applications postmarked or electronically submitted on or after September 18, 2026. USCIS also stated that older versions of the form would not be accepted after the effective date.
That makes September 18 an important dividing line for people pursuing adjustment of status. It also means that applicants and attorneys must pay attention to both the substantive immigration standard and the procedural requirements for submitting the correct forms.
What happens next
The immediate issue is now in the federal courts.
The states and local governments are asking judges to stop or invalidate the regulation. Immigrant advocacy organizations have filed their own challenge. The federal government will defend the rule and argue that DHS acted within authority granted by Congress.
The courts will have to examine the statutory meaning of public charge, the extent of DHS discretion, the agency’s explanation for reversing the 2022 framework, and whether the regulation satisfies the requirements of administrative law.
The eventual outcome could have consequences well beyond the current administration because the litigation concerns the limits of executive agency authority in interpreting immigration statutes.
For now, however, the basic facts are straightforward. The rule took effect September 18. It gives DHS officers broader discretion in public charge determinations. Certain means tested public benefits can receive greater consideration than they did under the 2022 framework. Several states and local governments have challenged the rule. Additional immigrant advocacy organizations have filed suit. And, as of September 19, 2026, the courts have not stopped the rule from operating.
That leaves the country with a policy already in effect and a legal battle that has only begun. The administration says the change restores statutory authority and reinforces financial self sufficiency.
The challengers say DHS exceeded its authority and created an immigration standard that can improperly penalize lawful benefit use.
The federal courts will ultimately determine which legal interpretation survives.
Sources
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-07-20/pdf/FR-2026-14539.pdf
https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCIS/bulletins/420cbcb
https://www.njoag.gov/ag-davenport-challenges-trump-administrations-public-charge-rule/
https://ccrjustice.org/home/what-we-do/our-cases/make-road-new-york-v-dhs
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #ImmigrationPolicy #PublicChargeRule #FederalCourtChallenge
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
No End in Sight: Gaza Truce, Lebanon Occupation, Iran Campaign and Yemen Offensive
Houthi Red Sea Advance and the Return of Large Scale Fighting in Yemen
The Middle East in mid September 2026 is defined by several connected but distinct wars that have not ended.
A ceasefire that took effect in Gaza in October 2025 stopped the heaviest fighting but left reconstruction blocked and targeted Israeli operations continuing. Israel holds a self declared security zone covering about 6 percent of Lebanon and continues operations against Hezbollah infrastructure.
A joint United States and Israeli campaign against Iran that began on 28 February 2026 has passed 200 days with pauses, missile exchanges, and pressure on oil shipping. In Yemen, Houthi forces seized Red Sea ports and islands in September, triggering new Saudi strikes and mass displacement. Syria, under President Ahmed al Sharaa since the fall of Bashar al Assad in December 2024, is integrating former Kurdish led forces while Israeli troops conduct repeated incursions in the south.
Gaza’s October 2025 ceasefire was the first phase of a United States brokered plan. Israel withdrew to a line that left its forces in control of roughly half the territory. Hamas released the remaining living hostages and some bodies. Palestinian prisoners were freed in exchange. Major reconstruction never started. Israel has stated it will not allow rebuilding until Hamas is disarmed. Most of the population lives in tents or damaged buildings.
On 16 September a six story structure in Gaza City that had been hit in earlier strikes collapsed, killing 21 people including eight children.
Rescue teams pulled 45 others from the rubble. Palestinian authorities report more than 2,000 additional buildings at risk of collapse. The Gaza Health Ministry puts the overall death toll since October 2023 at more than 73,800, with over 1,300 of those deaths occurring after the ceasefire began. Israeli forces have continued strikes they describe as targeting Hamas commanders who participated in the 7 October 2023 attack or who are rebuilding capabilities. Two such commanders were reported killed in mid September. Aid groups warn that new Israeli registration rules for foreign organizations could disrupt remaining operations.
In Lebanon the latest round of intense fighting began on 2 March 2026 after Hezbollah fired rockets in response to the opening of the Iran war.
Israel expanded its ground presence into a zone that now reaches up to 10 kilometers north of the border in places and includes territory north of the Litani River. Lebanese health authorities record 4,386 deaths and more than 12,400 injuries since that date, bringing the total since October 2023 to nearly 9,000 killed.
In June the United States, Israel and Lebanon signed a framework in Washington that called for sequenced Hezbollah disarmament, Lebanese army deployment in pilot zones, and eventual Israeli withdrawal. Hezbollah rejected the document as a surrender of sovereignty. Israel has destroyed extensive underground complexes, including a command network under Ali al Taher ridge in September. UNIFIL peacekeepers, whose mandate ends at the close of 2026, now operate inside much of the occupied zone. Residents of remaining Christian villages inside the zone fear isolation once the peacekeepers leave.
The Iran campaign opened on 28 February 2026 with coordinated United States and Israeli strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and dozens of senior officials.
Iran responded with missiles and drones against Israel and American bases in the Gulf. The Strait of Hormuz, through which a large share of global oil moves, has seen repeated disruptions. A June memorandum of understanding produced a temporary pause that President Trump later declared over. Fighting resumed. By mid September the campaign had reached day 203. Iran has downed American drones and struck a tanker it accused of illegal passage.
Satellite imagery shows rapid reconstruction work at the Taleghan 2 site inside the Parchin complex, a location previously linked to nuclear weapons research. United Nations commissioned investigators stated there are reasonable grounds to conclude that certain American strikes, including one on a school in Minab that killed scores of civilians, were indiscriminate. The same investigators accused Iranian authorities of crimes against humanity in the domestic crackdown that accompanied the war. President Trump has said he faces a decision on whether to “annihilate” the Iranian regime. Oil prices have traded above 100 dollars a barrel during the latest Houthi and Hormuz disruptions.
Yemen’s long civil war intensified in the first half of September 2026 when Houthi forces captured the port of Mocha and nearby Red Sea islands, giving them greater leverage over the Bab al Mandeb strait.
They launched drones and missiles at Saudi energy infrastructure and the east west oil pipeline. Saudi Arabia reported debris from an intercepted drone killing one person inside the kingdom and accused the Houthis of attempting an attack near Mecca, which Riyadh called a red line. The United Nations recorded more than 112,000 people displaced in a matter of weeks. Saudi aircraft struck Houthi held areas in return. Reports indicated Riyadh had begun indirect contacts with the Houthis through Oman. The offensive is widely viewed as an attempt by Iran’s remaining allies to open a second maritime front after pressure on the Strait of Hormuz.
Syria’s transitional government under Ahmed al Sharaa, the former Hayat Tahrir al Sham commander who became president in January 2025, has absorbed the Syrian Democratic Forces after their formal dissolution in August 2026. The United States removed Syria from its state sponsors of terrorism list in late August. Sharaa has sought investment and a possible security arrangement with Israel while insisting on Syrian rights in the Golan Heights. Israeli forces have conducted dozens of incursions into Quneitra and Daraa provinces in September, arresting residents and striking positions they say threaten Israel.
The new Syrian army is rebuilding with older Soviet equipment after earlier Israeli strikes destroyed much of the advanced arsenal left by Assad.
Israeli security officials have expressed concern that Damascus is prioritizing military expansion over civilian reconstruction. Islamic State cells remain active; a recent raid in Daraa killed three Syrian security personnel. Fuel price increases triggered street protests in mid September.
These theaters affect one another. Houthi advances followed Iranian pressure on Hormuz. Hezbollah’s March rocket fire followed the start of the Iran war. Israeli operations in Syria and Lebanon are presented by Jerusalem as necessary to prevent the reconstitution of Iranian proxy networks after the loss of Assad and the damage to Hezbollah and Hamas.
(I offer the video as another view of what is perceived to be going on. I do not agree entirely with everything said therein… But there are some truths we need to hear. - Editor)
Diplomacy continues around the United Nations General Assembly, with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas scheduled to speak by video after the United States again denied him a visa.
Iranian officials received limited permission to attend. No comprehensive settlement is in sight. Each front remains capable of sudden escalation that would further disrupt energy markets and produce additional civilian casualties.
Sources
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/details-gaza-ceasefire-agreement-2025-10-10/
https://www.ochaopt.org/content/reported-impact-snapshot-gaza-strip-9-september-2026
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7708dy33pdo
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/6/nearly-9000-killed-in-israeli-attacks-on-lebanon-since-2023
https://www.jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Iran-War-Update-9.18.26.pdf
https://www.npr.org/2026/09/18/nx-s1-5973810/houthi-attacks-saudi-oil-world-markets
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Ahmed_al-Sharaa
https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/east-mediterranean-mena/syria
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #MiddleEastWars #GazaAfterCeasefire #IranWar2026
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Green’s Immigration Articles Die on a 232 to 147 Vote
House Tables Trump Impeachment as 64 Democrats Step Aside
The House on September 15, 2026, killed another attempt to impeach President Donald Trump. The vote was not a simple party line.
Eighteen Democrats voted with Republicans to table the resolution. Forty six more Democrats voted present. Combined, those 64 Democrats declined to keep the measure alive. The House then approved the motion to table, 232 to 147, with 47 members recorded as present. One of those present votes came from Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky.
The resolution came from Rep. Al Green, Democrat of Texas. He used a privileged resolution, a House tool that forces a floor vote within two legislative days. Republicans answered with a motion to table. Tabling does not judge guilt or innocence. It ends debate and buries the articles before the House ever votes on impeachment itself.
Green’s articles targeted Trump’s handling of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection. He cited four deaths involving federal immigration agents this year: Renee Good, Alex Pretti, Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, and Johan Sebastian Duran Guerrero. Green called the question a life and death matter and said colleagues who criticized him lacked the courage to debate him in public.
House Democratic leaders refused to whip the vote. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Whip Katherine Clark, and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar said impeachment is a constitutional tool that usually follows hearings, document review, and witness testimony. They said none of that work had been done while Republicans control the House. They voted present and urged the caucus to stay focused on costs facing voters before the November midterms.
That stance split the party into three groups. About 147 members, all Democrats, voted against tabling and wanted a vote on the articles. That was the largest bloc of House support for impeaching Trump in his second term. Eighteen Democrats voted with nearly every Republican to kill the resolution.
The 18 were Kathy Castor of Florida, Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri, James Clyburn of South Carolina, Henry Cuellar of Texas, Don Davis of North Carolina, Shomari Figures of Alabama, Laura Gillen of New York, Jared Golden of Maine, Adam Gray of California, Rick Larsen of Washington, Susie Lee of Nevada, Kristen McDonald Rivet of Michigan, Jared Moskowitz of Florida, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, Josh Riley of New York, Hillary Scholten of Michigan, Darren Soto of Florida, and Tom Suozzi of New York. Several of those names sit in competitive or swing leaning districts.
Green has tried this path before. Democrats impeached Trump twice in his first term. The Senate did not convict either time. In this term Green has forced multiple privileged resolutions. In June 2025 he sought impeachment over strikes on Iranian nuclear sites without a new war vote from Congress. The House tabled that measure 344 to 79, and 128 Democrats joined Republicans. The September 2026 vote shows fewer Democrats willing to help bury the articles, but still enough to finish the job.
The politics are blunt. A Republican House will not impeach a Republican president on these facts. A Republican Senate would not convict. Green lost his Houston area primary after redistricting and leaves Congress in January. Leadership treated the vote as a symbolic fight that would crowd out kitchen table messaging in the last full House week before the midterms. Progressive voters wanted a harder line on immigration enforcement deaths. Frontline Democrats wanted distance from an effort that could not pass.
Jamie Raskin, who would likely lead Judiciary if Democrats win the House, has said the party would not hesitate to use impeachment if the facts and the process justified it. That is the live question after this vote.
The House did not rule on whether the four deaths amount to an impeachable offense.
It ruled that Green’s shortcut would not get a trial on the floor this week.
Sources
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/15/us/politics/house-trump-impeachment-democrats.html
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/house-al-green-resolution-trump-impeachment/
https://www.axios.com/2026/09/15/trump-impeachment-house-vote-al-green-democrats
https://www.newsweek.com/list-of-democrats-who-voted-to-stop-trump-impeachment-effort-12447939
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-democrats-help-republicans-kill-trump-impeachment-effort
https://newrepublic.com/post/215481/every-democrat-who-voted-against-impeaching-donald-trump
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #ImpeachmentTabled #HouseVote #DemocratsSplit
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
417–3 Landslide: House Makes Data Centers Pay Their Own Power Bill
Why Only Three Members Voted No
The House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act (H.R. 9340) on September 16, 2026, by a 417-3 vote.
The bill creates a federal standard that state regulators can adopt for large-load customers—primarily AI data centers drawing 100 MW or more. Operators of those facilities would have to cover the incremental costs of new generation, transmission, and related grid upgrades rather than shifting them onto residential ratepayers.
Think of the electric grid like a shared highway system that everyone pays for through their monthly bill. A giant AI data center is like a new factory that suddenly needs its own extra lanes, on-ramps, and power substations just to handle the traffic it creates. Building that extra infrastructure is expensive.
Without this kind of rule, the utility company can spread those extra costs across everyone’s bills—your house, your neighbor’s apartment, the local grocery store. You end up helping pay for the data center’s electricity needs even though you never use them. This bill says: if a facility is huge (roughly the electricity use of tens of thousands of homes), the company that owns it should pay for the extra power plants, wires, and upgrades that exist mainly because of them. Regular customers shouldn’t see their rates go up just so a tech company can run its servers.
It doesn’t ban data centers or force them to pay for the entire grid. It just tries to keep the bill for their extra demand from landing on everyone else’s electric bill. States would still decide the exact details; this creates a federal guideline they can follow.
It moved under suspension of the rules (requiring a two-thirds majority) and drew near-unanimous support. The three “no” votes came from Reps. Summer Lee (D-PA), Delia Ramirez (D-IL), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI). Republican votes were 210-0; Democratic votes were 206-3.
Why did Reps. Summer Lee, Delia Ramirez, and Rashida Tlaib say no?
They voted no because they thought the bill was too weak, not because they wanted households to keep subsidizing data centers. The clearest public explanation came from Rep. Rashida Tlaib. Before the vote she said the bill “fails to meaningfully protect our communities” and that Congress should instead pass a national moratorium on data centers and ban them on federal land.
Reps. Summer Lee and Delia Ramirez did not get as much quoted coverage, but reporting groups all three together as the progressive left flank: they wanted stronger, mandatory rules (or a pause on new data-center construction), not a voluntary federal standard that states can consider and still ignore.
In short:
-
Supporters said: make big data centers pay for the extra power plants and wires they need.
-
These three said: that still lets states opt out, ignores water use, pollution, and local impacts, and treats rapid data-center growth as inevitable instead of something Congress should slow or stop.
Most other Democrats called the bill a “start” or even “the bare minimum” and voted yes anyway. These three decided a start that they viewed as mostly symbolic was not worth supporting.
Rep. Gabe Evans (R-CO) introduced the measure with Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) as a co-sponsor. Supporters framed it as a kitchen-table affordability issue: data-center demand is already a noticeable share of the grid and is projected to grow sharply. Critics who voted no argued the bill does not go far enough and called for a moratorium on new data centers.
Two members of Congress from opposite parties teamed up on this bill: Gabe Evans, a Republican from Colorado, and Kathy Castor, a Democrat from Florida. The people who liked the bill sold it in everyday terms: your electric bill. Data centers that train and run AI already use a lot of power—enough that you can notice it on the grid—and that use is expected to keep climbing fast. Their argument was simple: regular families shouldn’t see higher monthly bills just so tech companies can plug in giant computer warehouses.
The three members who voted no said that wasn’t enough. Making data centers pay for extra wires and power plants is a start, but it doesn’t stop new centers from being built, doesn’t force every state to follow the rule, and doesn’t deal with other problems like water use or neighborhood impacts. They wanted Congress to hit pause on new data centers instead of just tweaking who pays for the electricity.
The bill now heads to the Senate.
It is one of several bipartisan measures the House advanced this week ahead of the midterms.
SOURCES;
Official / vote
-
Bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9340
-
Actions: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9340/all-actions
-
House roll call 312: https://clerk.house.gov/Votes
Coverage
-
Politico: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/16/house-passes-bill-data-center-power-costs-01076743
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #RatepayerProtection #DataCenterBills #AIPowerCosts
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Ohio Courthouse Erupts After Convicted Defendant Breaks Free and Attacks Officers
Timothy Reaggle allegedly broke his handcuffs, attacked courthouse officers and ran for the exit moments after receiving a prison sentence.
A routine sentencing hearing in Columbiana County, Ohio, turned into a violent escape attempt Monday when 20 year old Timothy J. Reaggle allegedly broke free from his handcuffs, attacked courthouse security officers and ran toward the courthouse exit.
The incident unfolded immediately after Reaggle was sentenced to one year in prison in an earlier criminal case.
The incident occurred at the Columbiana County Courthouse in Lisbon following a 1 p.m. sentencing hearing before Judge Scott Washam. Reaggle had been handcuffed in front by security bailiff Keith Thorn and was being escorted from the courtroom toward a holding area. Witness accounts reported that he was crying as he was taken from the courtroom.
According to witnesses and local reporting, the situation changed almost instantly. Reaggle allegedly broke the handcuffs, turned around and struck Thorn, knocking the bailiff to the floor. He then ran down the hallway and knocked security bailiff Steve Boyd down as he headed toward the stairwell.
The escape attempt did not end at the stairwell. Deputy Nick Rusyn pursued Reaggle while other law enforcement officers moved to intercept him. Deputy Coltan Vollnogle and Sheriff’s Office Detective Jesse Smith encountered Reaggle near the lower level. Authorities said Reaggle continued resisting and temporarily broke free from the officers before Rusyn used a Taser.
Reaggle was eventually taken to the ground near the courthouse security area and restrained. Officers placed him back in handcuffs and transported him to the Columbiana County Jail. The original handcuffs were reportedly visibly broken after the struggle, providing physical evidence of how he had managed to free himself.
The violence came at a significant moment in Reaggle’s existing criminal case. According to local reporting, he had pleaded guilty in July to several offenses connected to a February 2025 case.
Those offenses included aggravated burglary, aggravated assault, aggravated threats, failure to comply and two misdemeanor assault counts. He was sentenced to one year in prison.
The courthouse attack is therefore separate from the conduct that originally brought Reaggle before the judge. His previous convictions resulted in the sentence that was being carried out. The alleged attack and escape attempt could result in additional criminal charges because the new conduct occurred after the sentencing and involved law enforcement personnel.
Sheriff Brian McLaughlin said two officers were injured during the confrontation. Local reporting stated that the officers suffered broken bones and were taken to a hospital for treatment. Both were later released. The precise nature and severity of their injuries beyond the reported fractures had not been fully detailed in the available reports.
The response by courthouse personnel and law enforcement prevented Reaggle from reaching the building’s exterior. Video from the incident reportedly shows him moving toward the main doors before officers stopped him. The footage was subsequently released by the Columbiana County Sheriff’s Office and showed the struggle inside the courthouse.
Authorities now expect the courthouse incident itself to become another criminal case. Sheriff McLaughlin said anticipated charges include felony escape and assaults against police officers. Another local report said the charges are expected to proceed through a grand jury. Because those charges were still developing, they should be described as allegations rather than convictions.
The episode also demonstrates a practical problem faced by courthouse security. A defendant who has just received a prison sentence has a powerful immediate incentive to resist custody.
Handcuffs, security officers and controlled movement through the courthouse are designed to prevent precisely this type of situation. In this case, the physical restraints were overcome before multiple officers intervened.
Courthouses are controlled environments, but they are not immune to sudden violence. Judges, attorneys, witnesses, defendants, court employees and members of the public can all be present in relatively confined spaces. A violent confrontation can therefore develop quickly and place people who have nothing to do with a defendant’s criminal case in danger.
The incident also raises questions about how defendants should be handled immediately after sentencing. Security procedures vary between jurisdictions, but the transition from courtroom proceedings to detention is a particularly important stage because the defendant knows whether freedom is ending or whether a significant prison sentence is about to begin. The Reaggle incident shows how quickly that transition can become dangerous.
There is another important distinction between escape and an ordinary attempt to leave a courtroom. Reaggle was already under physical custody when he allegedly broke his restraints and assaulted officers. This was not simply a defendant walking away from a hearing. According to the available reports, he used physical force to break free, attacked courthouse personnel and continued running after officers attempted to stop him. That is why prosecutors are considering felony escape and additional assault charges.
The public video also changes the nature of the evidence available to investigators. Instead of relying solely on conflicting accounts from people who witnessed the incident, investigators have security footage showing portions of the confrontation.
Video evidence can help establish the sequence of events, identify individual actions and determine whether additional charges are supported.
For Reaggle, the consequences could extend well beyond the one year prison sentence imposed before the incident. If prosecutors pursue and obtain convictions on the anticipated new charges, any additional punishment would be determined through the criminal justice process. The exact charges and potential sentences depend on what prosecutors present to the grand jury and what charges are ultimately filed.
The case is also a reminder that a sentencing hearing does not necessarily mark the end of a defendant’s legal problems. A sentence resolves one portion of a criminal proceeding. New conduct occurring afterward can create entirely separate criminal liability. In this case, the alleged violence occurred after the judge had already imposed the original sentence.
What happened inside the Columbiana County Courthouse was not a complicated legal dispute over sentencing. According to the available accounts, it was a physical confrontation that began when a defendant allegedly broke his restraints and attacked people responsible for maintaining his custody. The escape attempt ended before he reached the courthouse exterior, but two officers were injured and additional criminal charges are now expected.
The larger lesson is straightforward. Court security exists because defendants can react unpredictably when facing the consequences of criminal convictions.
The Reaggle case demonstrates how quickly a controlled courtroom environment can become a physical confrontation and how important rapid intervention can be when a defendant attempts to escape custody.
SOURCES
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #CourthouseViolence #CriminalJustice #OhioCrime
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
US and Iran Keep Trading Strikes With No Decisive Winner
Both Sides Claim Success as Casualties and Oil Prices Rise
There is an ongoing US-Iran conflict in 2026, often called the 2026 Iran war. It began with major US and Israeli airstrikes in late February that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior officials.
A fragile ceasefire and memorandum of understanding followed in June, but it collapsed in July amid disputes over the Strait of Hormuz. Fighting has continued in cycles of airstrikes, missile and drone exchanges, and naval incidents.
As of mid-September 2026 the fighting remains active but limited compared with the heaviest phases earlier in the year. The United States has conducted repeated airstrikes on Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps targets in southern Iran, including ports, missile and drone sites, air defenses, and some oil tankers linked to the IRGC. Iran has responded with missile and drone attacks on US and allied positions in the Gulf region and has attempted to interfere with commercial shipping. Recent incidents include US forces firing on boats near the Iranian coast and disputed claims about tanker explosions or mines in the Strait of Hormuz.
Neither side is clearly winning. The United States holds decisive advantages in airpower, naval power, and precision strikes. It has hit hundreds of Iranian military targets over months and has kept most of its forces relatively protected. Reported US deaths remain in the low dozens with hundreds wounded. Iran has suffered greater physical damage to military infrastructure, leadership losses, and civilian casualties in some strikes, yet it has not been forced to surrender control of the Strait or abandon its ability to launch missiles, drones, and harassment operations. Oil prices and regional shipping have been disrupted, which gives Iran leverage even when its conventional forces take heavier hits.
The conflict has settled into a pattern of tit-for-tat actions rather than a decisive campaign.
Both governments describe their actions as successful and the other side as failing. Talks have started and stalled multiple times. No full-scale invasion or collapse of either government has occurred. The situation remains dangerous and unresolved.
SOURCES;
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/07/09/world/iran-war-us-trump
https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/28/world/live-news/iran-war-strikes-trump
https://www.scmp.com/topics/us-israel-war-iran
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-war-20260902.htm
https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/israel-us-launch-strikes-iran-2026-02-28/
https://www.axios.com/2026/04/11/us-iran-navy-strait-of-hormuz
https://www.npr.org/2026/06/27/nx-s1-5872954/us-strikes-iran
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #USIranWar2026 #HormuzStandoff #NoClearWinner
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Federal Raids Target Mexican Mafia Leadership in Orange County
Operation Gangsta’s Paradise Results in 43 Arrests and Major Drug Seizures
Federal agents carried out a coordinated series of raids across Southern California on April 23, 2026, targeting members and associates of the Mexican Mafia prison gang.
The operation, called Gangsta’s Paradise, focused mainly on Orange County communities including Santa Ana, Anaheim, Lakewood, and Lake Elsinore. Agents from the FBI worked with local police departments, the DEA, IRS Criminal Investigation, and other agencies to serve warrants at about 30 locations before dawn.
Twenty five people were taken into custody that morning. Combined with others already held in state prisons and jails, authorities reported 43 defendants in custody out of 47 people named across three federal indictments. One of those indictments contained 66 counts. The charges included racketeering conspiracy, drug trafficking, kidnapping, extortion, illegal gambling, assault, and murder.
Investigators seized four kilograms of fentanyl, 54.4 kilograms of methamphetamine, nearly one kilogram of heroin, three kilograms of cocaine, 25 firearms, and more than 30,000 dollars in cash. Officials noted that much of the fentanyl appeared in pill form, a form that can cause deaths even in small amounts.
Prosecutors identified Luis Cardenas, a 48 year old inmate at Ironwood State Prison, as the person who directed Orange County operations from June 2024 through April 2026. Cardenas used contraband cell phones and encrypted messaging apps to issue orders to associates on the street. High ranking associates named in court papers included Jaime Alvarado of Lake Elsinore, Karina Cesena of Lake Elsinore, and Mario Flores of Anaheim. Another senior figure already in custody, Jose Antonio Ochoa Madrigal, was also charged.
The indictment alleged that the group collected extortion payments, or taxes, from street gangs and drug dealers. It also alleged that members operated illegal gambling businesses, known as slap houses, inside strip malls and private residences.
Violence enforced the rules. In one incident described in court documents, two defendants murdered a person at a gang controlled motel in Anaheim in February 2025. In another, associates kidnapped and assaulted an employee at a Stanton slap house in March 2025.
The Mexican Mafia, also called La Eme, formed in 1957 at a California youth correctional facility. Founders drew members from existing Los Angeles area street gangs and modeled the group after traditional organized crime structures. It later expanded through the adult prison system. Today it functions as a prison based organization that exerts control over many Hispanic street gangs in Southern California, often called Sureños. Full members number in the hundreds. They rely on thousands of associates and street gang members to carry out orders, collect money, and move drugs. The group has no single overall leader. Individual members hold authority to issue directives that others must follow.
First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli said the defendants posed a direct threat through murder, extortion, kidnapping, and drug sales. FBI Assistant Director Akil Davis described the raids as a step that made Orange County streets safer. Local police chiefs from Anaheim and Santa Ana emphasized that organized crime would not be tolerated in their cities.
This operation was not the first large scale effort against the Mexican Mafia. Earlier federal cases in the 1990s, 2010s, and 2022 also produced racketeering indictments and prison sentences. Those cases similarly described leaders directing street activity from inside prison walls. The 2026 arrests removed a specific layer of Orange County leadership and seized a substantial quantity of drugs and weapons. Replacement of arrested members remains a common pattern in prison gangs, so investigators described the work as ongoing rather than complete.
Defendants face possible decades in federal prison if convicted.
An indictment is an accusation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.
SOURCES
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-04-23/fbi-arrests-mexican-mafia-orange-county
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Mafia
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #OperationGangstasParadise #MexicanMafiaTakedown #FBIOrangeCountySweep
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
House Democrats Tour ICE Centers Holding People With Removal Orders
New Jersey Visit Focuses on Food, Medical Care, and Air Conditioning Complaints
On Wednesday, September 9, 2026, three House Democrats conducted oversight visits at two ICE detention facilities.
Representatives Analilia Mejia of New Jersey’s 11th District and Rob Menendez of New Jersey’s 8th District toured Delaney Hall in Newark, New Jersey.
Representative Gwen Moore of Wisconsin’s 4th District toured the Midwest Regional Reception Center in Leavenworth, Kansas. Representative Adriano Espaillat of New York also joined the New Jersey visit.
ICE described the visits as part of an effort to increase transparency. The agency stated that the members requested meetings with specific categories of detainees. Those categories included multiple individuals with final orders of removal, multiple individuals judged to be flight risks by immigration judges, one individual subject to mandatory detention under the Laken Riley Act, one accused of violating the Alien Registration Act, and one who overstayed a tourist visa and then bit an officer while in detention.
The Laken Riley Act, signed into law in January 2025, requires ICE to detain without bond certain noncitizens who are inadmissible and who have been arrested for, charged with, or convicted of specified offenses. Those offenses include burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting, assault on a law enforcement officer, or any crime that results in death or serious bodily injury. The law is named for Laken Riley, a nursing student killed in 2024 by an individual who had entered the country illegally and been released.
After her tour, Moore recorded a video outside the Kansas facility. She said the people she visited reported being treated like human beings. She added that she could not understand why they were held, describing them as not criminals and not dangerous.
In a related post she called them asylum seekers and mothers with no criminal records and far from the worst of the worst. She also stated that the operating company makes $307,000 off each bed and that profit, not public safety, drives ICE policy.
Moore’s office later described the detainees as her constituents who are held across the country. Wisconsin’s 4th District is more than 500 miles from Leavenworth. The facility serves as a Midwest regional reception center. CoreCivic, which manages day-to-day operations after selling the property to the Department of Homeland Security, said the $307,000 figure cited by Moore reflects an average sale price across several facilities rather than revenue earned per occupied bed.
At Delaney Hall, which is operated by GEO Group, Mejia, Menendez, and Espaillat issued a joint statement after their visit. They said they heard reports of delayed or denied medical care, spoiled food, and inadequate air conditioning. They called the situation a federally funded failure of care and said they would continue seeking answers about conditions and any deaths at the facility.
Mejia separately noted that ICE’s public list of requested meetings omitted chronically ill people, pregnant women, and others reporting medical problems.
ICE maintains that individuals in these facilities are held because they lack legal status, have removal orders, present flight risks, or fall under statutory mandatory detention rules. Entering or remaining in the United States without authorization is a violation of federal law. A final order of removal means an immigration judge has already determined the person must leave the country. Biting an officer constitutes assault.
Congressional visits to ICE facilities have been frequent and often contentious since 2025. Lawmakers have a statutory right to conduct oversight. ICE has at times limited unannounced access or restricted conversations with detainees. Courts have repeatedly addressed those restrictions. Delaney Hall itself has been the site of earlier protests, a reported hunger strike by some detainees, and a 2025 confrontation that led to federal charges against another New Jersey Democrat, Representative LaMonica McIver. Those charges remain pending.
The visits highlight a basic disagreement. Democratic members frame the facilities as sites of neglect that hold people who pose little threat. ICE and the administration frame the same facilities as tools for enforcing existing immigration statutes, including those that require detention of people already ordered removed or arrested for certain crimes.
Both sides agree the detainees are in federal custody.
They disagree on whether that custody is justified and whether conditions meet legal standards.
Sources
https://www.westernjournal.com/3-house-democrats-visit-ice-detention-center-meet-illegal-aliens-deportation-orders/ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/immigration/4718733/ice-hosts-house-democrats-two-detention-centers-oversight-visits/ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/immigration/4720704/wisconsin-democrat-gwen-moore-visits-constituents-kansas-ice-facility/ https://www.insidernj.com/press-release/reps-mejia-menendez-and-espaillat-conduct-oversight-visit-at-delaney-hall-following-reports-of-negligent-conditions/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laken_Riley_Act
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #ICEDetention #DeportationOrders #LakenRileyAct
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
The 19th Amendment Under Fire: What the Lindsay Clancy Case Has Unleashed
A Massachusetts mistrial has reignited an old political argument about whether women should have the constitutional right to vote.
The Lindsay Clancy murder case has produced a political controversy that reaches far beyond the courtroom.
After a Massachusetts jury deadlocked and a mistrial was declared, online arguments erupted over the 19th Amendment, the constitutional protection of women’s voting rights. Some people began calling for its repeal, arguing that the Clancy case exposed problems with women serving on juries and participating in political decisions. Those claims exist, but the repeal movement remains a fringe political effort rather than a serious congressional campaign.
The actual Clancy case must be separated from the political reaction surrounding it. Clancy was charged with killing her three children in January 2023. She did not dispute that she caused their deaths. Her defense argued that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was therefore not criminally responsible. Prosecutors argued that her actions were deliberate and that she should be held responsible under the law. After more than six weeks of testimony and approximately 40 hours of jury deliberation, the jury failed to reach a unanimous decision. The judge declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026.
The reported 11 to 1 division inside the jury has become the central point for people attacking the 19th Amendment. Eleven jurors reportedly favored finding Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, while one juror disagreed. That was not an acquittal and it was not a judgment by women as a group. It was a disagreement among twelve individual jurors about whether the evidence satisfied the legal standard for criminal responsibility.
That distinction matters because a jury is not supposed to represent a particular sex, political party or social group. Jurors are individuals selected to evaluate evidence and follow the law as explained by the court. If their decision is wrong, the legal system provides mechanisms for addressing that problem. The existence of disagreement inside one jury does not establish that millions of other citizens are incapable of making rational decisions.
The 19th Amendment itself is straightforward. It states that the right of citizens to vote cannot be denied or restricted by the United States or any state because of sex.
Congress approved the amendment in 1919, Tennessee became the 36th state to ratify it on August 18, 1920, and the ratification was certified shortly afterward. Its purpose was to remove sex as a constitutional barrier to voting.
Repealing the amendment would require far more than an ordinary congressional vote. Article V of the Constitution requires either approval by two thirds of both the House and Senate or a constitutional convention requested by two thirds of the states. After that, three fourths of the states must ratify the proposed amendment. The process was intentionally designed to prevent major constitutional changes from being made by temporary political majorities.
There is currently no comparable congressional campaign to repeal the 19th Amendment. Online petitions and social media campaigns have generated attention, particularly following the Clancy mistrial, but they have not developed into a constitutional effort with meaningful support in Congress or among the states. Public attention should not be confused with the political ability to amend the Constitution.
The arguments supporting repeal generally involve broader claims about women’s political judgment. Some critics argue that women are too emotional or too influenced by social issues to make responsible political decisions.
Others support household voting systems in which a family would effectively receive one political vote, often controlled by the husband. Arguments of this kind are not new. Similar claims were made by opponents of women’s suffrage more than a century ago.
The Clancy case has added a particularly emotional dimension because the defense centered on postpartum psychosis and the effect of severe mental illness on criminal responsibility. There is a legitimate debate over how the law should treat defendants experiencing serious psychiatric conditions. There is also legitimate disagreement over the evidence in Clancy’s case. Neither issue establishes that women as a sex lack the ability to make rational decisions.
Another argument concerns military responsibility. Under current federal law, almost all male citizens and male immigrants between ages 18 and 25 must register with Selective Service. Women are not required to register. That difference is real. However, voting rights are not legally conditioned on military registration. Americans can debate whether Selective Service should apply to women, whether the system should be changed or whether compulsory military service should exist at all. Those are separate policy questions.
Election data also challenges the idea that women vote as one political bloc. In the 2024 presidential election, 66.9 percent of eligible women voted compared with 63.7 percent of eligible men. Among those who voted, 55 percent of men reported voting for Donald Trump compared with 46 percent of women. The figures show a gender difference in voting behavior, but they also demonstrate that women are not politically uniform.
Project 2025 has also been pulled into the controversy. Claims that Project 2025 formally proposes repealing the 19th Amendment are not supported by the text of the blueprint itself. The document contains extensive recommendations concerning elections, federal agencies and government policy. Critics have raised concerns about some of those proposals and their possible effects on voting access. That is different from saying the document contains a formal plan to eliminate women’s constitutional voting rights.
There are individuals and activists associated with conservative and religious movements who have openly discussed household voting or restricting women’s political participation.
Those views are part of the public debate and can be reported without pretending they represent every conservative, every Republican or every supporter of Project 2025. Political movements are made up of competing people and organizations, and statements from individual activists do not automatically become official policy.
The history of the 19th Amendment also contains an important complication. Ratification did not immediately create equal voting access for every American woman. Discriminatory laws and practices continued to prevent many women, particularly African American women, from exercising their rights. Later federal legislation and constitutional changes addressed additional barriers. American voting rights therefore developed through a much larger process than the 19th Amendment alone.
Criticism of the Clancy jury is legitimate. Americans can question the evidence, the defense strategy, the insanity standard and the way jurors evaluated the testimony. Those questions belong in legal and public policy discussions. What does not logically follow is that disagreement with one jury requires removing a constitutional voting protection from an entire sex.
The case also illustrates how quickly social media can transform a criminal proceeding into a larger ideological conflict. Arguments about maternal mental health became arguments about criminal responsibility. Those arguments then expanded into disputes over feminism, political power, jury composition and women’s voting rights. As the political debate grew, the actual legal question became increasingly difficult to separate from the surrounding commentary.
Clancy’s criminal case remains unresolved because the mistrial produced no final verdict. She remains in a psychiatric facility, and prosecutors have not yet announced whether they will seek another trial. Her defense has asked the court to prevent a retrial, arguing that the evidence does not establish criminal responsibility. A hearing is scheduled for September 29, 2026.
That unresolved legal status is important. There has been no conviction establishing the prosecution’s position, and there has been no insanity acquittal establishing the defense position. The only final result from the trial itself was a mistrial caused by the jury’s inability to reach a unanimous decision.
The larger constitutional question is much broader than the Clancy case. Americans can debate whether voting laws should require proof of citizenship, how elections should be administered, whether jury standards should change and how the justice system should handle severe mental illness. Those debates can be vigorous without turning the actions of one defendant into evidence against millions of other citizens.
The fundamental question behind the repeal movement is whether political rights belong to individual citizens or can be limited according to sex. The Constitution has historically moved toward expanding political participation rather than restricting it. Repealing the 19th Amendment would reverse that principle by restoring the constitutional ability to deny voting rights because someone is a woman.
@stevensonrf - And here’s the problem: the majority of the women on that jury forgot one crucial thing… They forgot that they were jurors not activists.
For that reason, the current calls deserve to be acknowledged without exaggerating their political strength.
They are real, visible and increasingly discussed online, but there is no evidence that Congress is preparing to repeal the 19th Amendment or that the states are approaching the level of agreement required to accomplish it.
The Clancy case may continue to fuel the argument, but a criminal jury dispute is not a constitutional referendum on American women.
SOURCES
https://apnews.com/article/efa1ee812def91a23f61d7f07b6a5120
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lindsay-clancy-mistrial-what-happens-next/
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/lindsay-clancy-juror-interview/
https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/lindsay-clancy-19th-amendment-debate-22430794.php
https://www.change.org/p/repeal-the-19th-amendment-in-light-of-the-lindsay-clancy-trial
https://legalclarity.org/revoke-the-19th-amendment-whos-behind-the-push/
https://legalclarity.org/what-does-repeal-the-19th-mean-origins-and-movement/
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/19th-amendment
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution/what-does-it-say
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution
https://www.sss.gov/register/who-needs-to-register/
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/06/26/voting-patterns-in-the-2024-election/
https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/PDF/IF12902/IF12902.2.pdf
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/22
https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/does-project-2025-want-women-to-not-vote-132e07
https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/is-project-25-trying-to-ban-women-from-voting-90c080
https://msmagazine.com/2024/11/29/christian-nationalism-project-2025-women-right-to-vote-suffrage/
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #19thAmendment #WomensVotingRights #LindsayClanc
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
American Suspect Arrested With 5,445 Rounds Near Arizona Border
Cartel Logistics Exposed: Thousands of Rounds Seized From American Suspect
Mexican authorities arrested an American woman in Sonora after seizing 5,445 rounds of 7.62 × 39 mm ammunition and a vehicle near the San Luis Río Colorado border crossing, directly across from San Luis, Arizona.
Authorities identified the woman as Yanet “N” and accused her of serving as a logistics operator for a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel.
The case received additional attention because authorities reportedly found an identification card that appeared to have been issued by the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry. The card reportedly identified Yanet Dowden as a Level II correctional officer. However, the authenticity of the credential and whether she actually worked for the Arizona corrections department remained under verification.
Possessing an identification card does not by itself establish current government employment. There is also no publicly established evidence showing that an Arizona corrections position was used to obtain ammunition, provide confidential information or facilitate the alleged trafficking operation.
Mexican officials reported that the seized ammunition consisted of 5,445 cartridges chambered for the 7.62 × 39 mm cartridge, commonly associated with rifles such as AK type firearms. Authorities estimated the value of the seized material at approximately 1.655 million Mexican pesos. The ammunition seizure is one of the confirmed elements of the case.
According to Mexico’s Security Cabinet, intelligence from several federal agencies had identified Yanet “N” as an alleged logistics operator involved in the movement of weapons for a Sinaloa Cartel faction. Mexico’s Navy, Defense Secretariat, Federal Attorney General’s Office, National Guard and Secretariat of Security and Citizen Protection participated in the operation.
Mexican reporting has connected the alleged operation to Los Mayos, also known as La Mayiza.
The faction is associated with Ismael Zambada Sicairos, known as “Mayito Flaco,” the son of longtime Sinaloa Cartel figure Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada. The Sinaloa organization has been divided by competing factions, including Los Mayos and Los Chapitos, contributing to continuing violence in parts of northwestern Mexico.
The case also illustrates why ammunition trafficking is an important part of organized criminal logistics. Criminal organizations continually consume ammunition during armed confrontations, training and other operations. A large ammunition shipment can therefore provide a significant operational resource, while a seizure can prevent that material from reaching its intended destination.
The broader trafficking problem extends beyond this arrest. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives reported that federal authorities had seized more than 2.3 million rounds of ammunition since January 20, 2025, including 648,975 rounds that authorities said were destined for Mexico.
Arizona has also been involved in separate federal investigations involving ammunition allegedly intended for Mexican buyers.
In one 2026 prosecution, defendants admitted conspiring to obtain firearms and ammunition in Arizona for buyers in Mexico. Investigators seized 56,000 rounds in that case, while the broader investigation involved more than 125,000 rounds. That investigation is separate from the Sonora arrest.
These separate cases demonstrate how trafficking networks can operate across multiple jurisdictions. A criminal supply chain can involve suppliers, buyers, transporters and people responsible for logistics. The person physically transporting ammunition may therefore represent only one part of a larger organization.
The reported corrections connection creates another serious question, but it must be handled carefully. If the credential proves authentic and the woman is confirmed to have been employed by Arizona corrections, investigators could examine whether her employment provided access, information or opportunities that benefited the alleged criminal operation. There is currently no established evidence that this occurred.
The same caution applies to claims that she was an active Arizona corrections officer at the time of her arrest.
Mexican authorities reportedly identified her through the credential, but Arizona employment records and the authenticity of the identification were still being examined. Until that verification is completed, the corrections connection remains an allegation rather than an established fact.
Mexican authorities transferred the suspect to a federal prosecutor after informing her of her legal rights. Prosecutors will determine what charges are pursued and what evidence can be established. An arrest does not constitute a conviction, and the allegations will have to be tested through the legal process.
The location of the arrest is also significant because San Luis Río Colorado sits directly across the international border from San Luis, Arizona. The area handles substantial legitimate movement of people and vehicles while also presenting opportunities for criminal organizations attempting to move illicit material across the border. Mexican authorities said the arrest occurred during security and crime prevention operations near the international crossing.
The investigation demonstrates why authorities must look beyond the individual carrying contraband. Organized criminal groups depend on logistics, transportation, money, weapons and ammunition. Disrupting one part of that system can interfere with the organization’s ability to operate, but identifying the larger network is necessary if authorities want to dismantle the supply chain rather than simply make individual arrests.
The United States has a direct interest in these investigations because ammunition and firearms allegedly moving south into Mexico can originate inside American communities.
Mexico has an equally direct interest because criminal organizations use weapons and ammunition to maintain territorial control, fight rival groups and conduct violent operations. The trafficking problem therefore crosses the border in both its causes and consequences.
The most important unanswered questions now concern the reported Arizona corrections credential. Investigators still need to establish whether it is authentic, whether Yanet Dowden actually worked for the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, what role she allegedly played in the ammunition movement and whether additional people were involved. Authorities may also determine whether a related investigation should take place in the United States.
For now, the confirmed facts should remain separate from the allegations. Mexican authorities arrested a U.S. citizen in Sonora and seized 5,445 rounds of ammunition and a vehicle. Officials accuse the woman of serving as a logistics operator for a Sinaloa Cartel faction. A credential apparently identifying her as an Arizona corrections officer was found, but the employment connection remains subject to verification.
The significance of the case does not depend on exaggeration. Thousands of rounds of ammunition were seized in a border region, Mexican authorities allege a connection to a major criminal organization and an apparent government employment credential has raised questions that remain unanswered. The investigation now has to establish what is fact, what is evidence and what ultimately can be proven in court.
Mexican authorities accuse a U.S. citizen of serving as a logistics operator for a Sinaloa Cartel faction while questions remain about her reported Arizona corrections connection.
A major ammunition seizure near the Arizona border has raised questions about cartel supply networks and an identification card reportedly linked to Arizona corrections.
The ammunition seizure is confirmed.
The cartel connection is under investigation. The reported corrections employment remains unverified.
Sources
https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/28-charged-firearms-offenses-hstf-takedown
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/atf-seizes-thousands-illegal-firearms-bound-cartels-mexico
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #CartelTrafficking #AmmunitionSmuggling #BorderSecurity
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
This Is Who They Really Are
Laughing Inappropriately as 9/11 Victims Were Called Out...
People in these comments are furious because they saw AOC Omar and Mamdani at a memorial for the dead acting like it was a joke.
Families were hurting and these officials looked like they were laughing and showing off.
Commenters call that sick and say it proves they do not give a damn about the people who died the first responders or the country those people served. They keep asking who keeps putting them in office and why New Yorkers keep doing it when the disrespect is this obvious.
The same crowd is done with excuses. They want these three gone and they say anyone who still votes for them after watching that scene is helping the problem.
They talk about lying about family members who do not exist showing up just to gloat and treating a day of mourning like a photo op.
The message running through almost every reply is simple. If this is how they act when Americans are grieving they have no business holding power and people need to stop pretending otherwise.
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #NoRespectForTheDead #VoteThemOut #TheyShowedUpToGloat
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Section 8 Funding Crisis: Housing Authorities Warn That Existing Vouchers Could Be at Risk
Section 8 at a Financial Crossroads: What Voucher Holders Need to Know
The federal Housing Choice Voucher program, commonly known as Section 8, is facing a serious funding problem in 2026.
This is not simply a matter of fewer people being placed on waiting lists. Federal housing officials have warned that some public housing authorities may not have enough money to maintain every voucher already being used if program costs continue to exceed available funding. HUD has instructed housing authorities to take immediate steps to control expenses and has specifically warned that funding may not be sufficient to resolve every shortfall.
That distinction matters. A Housing Choice Voucher is not simply a benefit that exists independently of federal funding. The local housing authority must have enough federal Housing Assistance Payment money to make the required payments to participating landlords. When rents and other program costs rise faster than the federal funding available to a housing authority, the agency can enter what HUD calls a funding shortfall. The problem is therefore a financial mismatch between the cost of maintaining assistance and the money available to pay for it.
The federal government did provide funding for the Housing Choice Voucher program for 2026. HUD’s February 2026 budget management letter states that Congress enacted the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, which provides funding for the program. However, HUD also estimated a 99 percent proration factor for Housing Assistance Payments and warned that funding at individual housing authorities could still fall short of what is needed to maintain all existing assistance.
In other words, the existence of an annual federal appropriation does not automatically mean every local housing authority has enough money to cover every obligation.
The underlying pressure is closely connected to rental costs. Housing authorities calculate their program expenses based on the rents they must subsidize for participating families. HUD reported that per unit costs at many housing authorities have continued to increase faster than the rental inflation factors being used to calculate renewal funding. This creates a gap. If the cost of supporting an existing voucher rises faster than the funding available to support it, the housing authority has to find savings somewhere else.
HUD has therefore directed housing authorities to begin controlling costs before the situation becomes more severe. Among the measures HUD has identified are stopping the issuance of most new vouchers, reducing payment standards, reviewing rent reasonableness procedures and taking additional cost saving actions. HUD has also warned that housing authorities that received shortfall assistance in 2025 are considered at risk of another shortfall in 2026 until their financial circumstances are reassessed.
Stopping new voucher issuance is one of the most immediate consequences. A person sitting on a waiting list may therefore remain eligible for assistance while the housing authority is unable to issue the voucher because it does not have enough funding. This creates an important distinction between eligibility and availability. A family can qualify for the program while still being unable to receive assistance because the local agency lacks sufficient funding or available vouchers.
The problem can also affect people who already receive assistance, although that does not mean every current Section 8 recipient is automatically facing termination. HUD’s current policy establishes procedures for housing authorities experiencing confirmed shortfalls and identifies circumstances in which voucher issuance must be suspended. HUD has also created funding set aside procedures specifically designed to prevent terminations caused by insufficient funds. The federal government is therefore attempting to manage the problem before existing assistance is actually terminated.
Nevertheless, the possibility of termination is real enough that some housing authorities are preparing policies for it. The Decatur Housing Authority in Illinois recently proposed an amendment to its Housing Choice Voucher Administrative Plan establishing a specific policy for an extraordinary funding shortfall. The agency stated clearly that it is not currently terminating vouchers. Its proposed policy would establish a process to be used only if federal Housing Assistance Payment funding and available reserves were insufficient to meet rental assistance obligations.
That example is important because it demonstrates what the current situation does and does not mean. It does not mean that every Section 8 participant in America is about to lose their voucher. It does mean that some housing authorities are preparing for the possibility that ordinary funding and reserves could eventually become inadequate. Local agencies have to prepare financial contingency plans because waiting until the money is exhausted would leave them with fewer options.
Other housing authorities are already making painful adjustments without terminating current participants. The Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority reported a projected funding shortfall and reduced its payment standard from 110 percent of Fair Market Rent to 100 percent. The authority said the change was connected to federal funding that had not kept pace with increasing rents and Housing Assistance Payment expenses. It also warned that some participating families could eventually have to contribute a larger share of their income toward housing costs as their annual recertifications occur under the revised payment standard.
The Housing Opportunities Commission of Montgomery County, Maryland, provides another example of how a funding problem can immediately affect the program. In June 2026, the agency announced that it had paused the issuance of new Housing Choice Vouchers because of a funding deficit connected to HUD’s recapture of reserves. The agency stated that existing participants could continue using their vouchers and could still relocate or port their assistance under the circumstances described by the agency. This shows that a funding crisis can initially be directed at new voucher issuance rather than automatically terminating assistance for people already housed.
The federal voucher program serves millions of households, and congressional appropriations have to account for both existing commitments and changing housing costs. A Senate appropriations report for fiscal year 2026 described the Section 8 tenant based voucher program as serving approximately 2.3 million families and recommended substantial funding for voucher renewals. The report also recognized that renewal costs are affected by federal estimates of program expenses and available reserves.
The problem becomes especially serious because the voucher system already serves only a portion of households that qualify for rental assistance. Housing assistance is limited by available funding, available vouchers and local administrative capacity. When an agency stops issuing new vouchers because of a shortfall, the waiting list can remain intact while the number of people actually receiving assistance remains frozen. That can create years of uncertainty for people who meet the eligibility requirements but have no guarantee that funding will be available when their name reaches the top of the list.
There is also a separate issue involving Emergency Housing Vouchers, which should not be confused with the regular Housing Choice Voucher program. Emergency Housing Vouchers were created during the pandemic to assist people experiencing or at risk of homelessness and survivors of domestic violence and related forms of abuse. Funding for that program has been running down, creating another housing assistance problem.
The National Low Income Housing Coalition has estimated that tens of thousands of households could be affected as Emergency Housing Voucher funding expires.
What happens next will depend heavily on federal funding decisions, rental market conditions and the financial position of individual housing authorities. HUD has acknowledged that its ability to resolve every 2026 shortfall is limited. That statement is significant because it means local housing authorities cannot simply assume that Washington will provide whatever additional money they need after their budgets become insufficient. HUD is encouraging agencies to make adjustments before their financial reserves are exhausted.
For current voucher holders, the most important point is that a funding crisis does not automatically equal an immediate loss of assistance. Each housing authority operates under federal rules and its own approved administrative plan. The circumstances surrounding any potential termination would matter. Families receiving vouchers should therefore pay close attention to official notices from their local housing authority, respond to recertification requirements and avoid relying on rumors circulating online. A proposed termination policy at one agency should not automatically be interpreted as a nationwide termination order.
The most accurate description of the situation today is therefore not that America is ending Section 8. That claim would go beyond the available evidence. The documented reality is more complicated and more immediate. Federal funding exists for 2026, but HUD has acknowledged significant financial pressure within the Housing Choice Voucher system.
Some housing authorities have already stopped issuing new vouchers, some have reduced payment standards, and some are preparing contingency policies in case funding becomes insufficient to maintain existing assistance.
The possibility of voucher terminations is a recognized risk under an extreme funding shortfall, not a blanket nationwide order that all current vouchers are being cancelled.
Address Links
https://www.hud.gov/sites/default/files/PIH/documents/2026-Budget-Management-Letter.pdf
https://www.hud.gov/helping-americans/housing-choice-vouchers-guidance
https://www.hud.gov/sites/default/files/hudclips/documents/PIH-2026-12.pdf
https://www.hud.gov/stat/pih/hcv-fmd
https://www.decaturhousing.org/news-view?id=189
https://nlihc.org/resource/16-2-housing-voucher-funding-needs-2026
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #Section8Crisis #HousingVoucherCrisis #AffordableHousing
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Why Ten Quarts of Kirkland Oil Cost Near Fifty Eight Dollars
What the two unit weekly limit actually means
Warehouse clubs in the United States are applying purchase limits on packaged motor oil.
Costco is limiting Kirkland Signature motor oil to two units per member every seven days.
Mobil 1 packs have a higher cap, reported as five units. A ten quart Kirkland case that used to sell in the mid thirties is now listed near fifty eight dollars.
This is a store limit, not a government coupon program. The squeeze comes from Group III base oil, the stock used in most full synthetic oil. A large share of that supply has come from Persian Gulf plants. Shipping trouble around the Strait of Hormuz, damage at a major Qatar gas to liquids plant, and refiners putting gasoline and diesel first have cut what reaches U.S. blenders and shelves. Automakers have told some dealers to stretch or substitute grades like 0W-20 and 5W-30.
This isn’t the same as World War II gasoline rationing. In 1942 the country limited gas mainly to save rubber for tires. Packaged motor oil was not run on that coupon system.
You can still buy motor oil. Bulk buys at warehouse clubs are capped, prices are higher, and some viscosities may be harder to find. Follow the oil change interval in the owner manual unless a shop gives a listed one time substitute.
The larger point is simple. A lot of the oil modern engines need depends on foreign base stock and a narrow shipping route. When that route or those plants fail, the shortage shows up in a Costco aisle.
The most visible case is Costco, which has capped Kirkland Signature full synthetic motor oil at two units per member every seven days, with reporting that the limit is one transaction per membership.
Mobil 1 packs sold at Costco have a higher reported cap of five units per member. These are retailer controls meant to stretch inventory and discourage bulk clearing of shelves. They are not a federal coupon program and they do not ban sales.
A common Kirkland case is two five quart bottles, or ten quarts total. Multiple automotive outlets in mid September 2026 listed that case at about $57.99, up from prices that sat in the mid $30 range for years. A six quart Mobil 1 case has been reported near $44. The house brand can still cost less per quart than some name brands, but the gap has narrowed and members can no longer load a cart without hitting the weekly cap.
Costco uses purchase limits on items that are short, high demand, or easy to empty in one trip. Motor oil does not spoil the way food does. A cap on oil is therefore a signal about supply and allocation, not a merchandising gimmick. Limits can vary by warehouse and by product page, so members should read the checkout note rather than assume every club matches every report.
This is not World War II style government rationing. No federal agency is issuing motor oil stamps. Drivers can still buy oil at Costco, parts stores, dealers, and quick lube shops if stock exists. The constraint is how much one membership can take in a week and which viscosities remain in the back room.
Finished motor oil is a blend. The bulk of a modern full synthetic bottle is base oil plus a smaller package of additives that control wear, sludge, oxidation, and viscosity. The American Petroleum Institute sorts base oils into groups.
Group III is a highly refined mineral base with high viscosity index. It is the workhorse stock behind most mass market “full synthetic” oils sold in the United States, including many private label and dexos licensed products.
The United States does not produce enough Group III at home to cover current demand. Trade reporting has put Middle East origin Group III at a large share of U.S. imports, with additional volume from Asia, especially South Korea. Lubes’N’Greases and related market reports have placed Middle East sources at nearly half of U.S. base oil imports in the mid 2020s, with Pearl GTL in Qatar a major Group III and Group III plus site. That import mix is why a regional shipping and plant shock shows up in a Costco aisle months later.
The Independent Lubricant Manufacturers Association has described the 2026 squeeze as a production problem on top of a logistics problem. Shipping trouble through the Strait of Hormuz cut Gulf exports. ILMA has also stated that Pearl GTL, called the world’s largest Group III producer, took damage to one of its two base oil trains, and that other Gulf plants have faced shutdowns or force majeure. Reopening a sea lane would help. It would not instantly refill tanks in the United States. Cargo still has to be made, loaded, shipped, discharged, allocated, and blended.
Refinery math adds pressure. Crude can be turned into gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, or lubricant stocks. When fuel margins are high, refiners have less reason to run the cuts that feed Group III. Korean plants can offset some lost Gulf barrels, but they also depend on Middle East crude and on the same fuel versus lube choice.
JobbersWorld reported that combined premium grade shipments from Bahrain, Qatar, and the UAE into major markets fell sharply in spring 2026 even as Korean exports rose. Premium approved grades remained tight.
Automakers felt the pinch before warehouse clubs posted aisle limits. In spring 2026, trade coverage said Toyota warned dealers that ExxonMobil could struggle to fill genuine low viscosity grades such as 0W-8 and 0W-16, and that temporary substitution to the next listed grade for a limited share of services was the stopgap. Nissan coverage described allocation cuts on genuine 0W-20 and 5W-30, including reports of about 55 percent of prior year volume on some grades, with warranty, recall, and prepaid maintenance first in line. Those notices concern dealer service oil, not a ban on every quart in America.
Modern engines make the shortage more awkward. Many late model gasoline engines specify 0W-20, 0W-16, or even 0W-8. Those thin oils need high quality Group III or Group III plus stocks plus tight additive control. Kirkland cases often carry GM dexos1 Gen 3 marking. ILMA asked GM and API for temporary licensing flexibility so blenders could keep legal formulations when a listed base oil disappeared. A substitute viscosity used once under a dealer bulletin is not the same as ignoring the owner’s manual for every change.
World War II rationing is a poor analogy if the point is “the government locked the oil can.” Eastern gasoline limits began 15 May 1942. Nationwide mileage rationing to save rubber began 1 December 1942. Officials said the main goal was tire conservation after Far East rubber supplies were cut, not a total lack of crude in Texas. Packaged passenger car motor oil was not the center of that coupon system. Today’s Costco cap is a private inventory rule during a Group III shortage.
Some social posts and secondary sites have claimed an AutoZone internal memo about a 40 percent drop and “the largest lubricant fluid shortage in modern U.S. history.” Treat leaked store memos as unverified unless the company publishes them. Treat single tweets about Mobil or Shell cutting Costco and Walmart as tips, not audited inventory data. The firmer public record is ILMA’s base oil briefings, OEM dealer notices reported by trade press, and Costco’s own listed price and limit language.
Drivers do not need to drain a healthy engine early to “stockpile.” Follow the interval in the owner’s manual. If a shop offers a documented one interval substitute that the manufacturer listed, that is different from grabbing a random heavier conventional oil. Keep the receipt and the specification on the bottle (API SP or current mark, ILSAC grade, and any OEM approval such as dexos). Do not mix random leftover quarts of unknown grade into a modern engine as a hobby.
Quick lube chains and dealers will pass through higher wholesale cost. A driveway change still needs a filter and a safe drain. Ten quarts at about $58 is still one or two changes for many four cylinder cars, so the weekly two unit cap is enough for a household that is not filling a fleet. Shops that service many cars per day face the tighter math.
Industry groups have said full normalization of Group III availability may run into 2027 because damaged capacity, depleted tanks, and new U.S. projects do not turn on in a week. That is a supply chain forecast, not a promise that every store will be empty tomorrow. Prices can stay high even after ships move if plants remain down and fuel still pays better than lube stock.
The factual bottom line is narrow. Packaged full synthetic oil is for sale. Costco is limiting how many Kirkland and Mobil 1 units one member can take per week.
Prices on the house ten quart case have moved from the mid $30s toward about $58. The cause is a real Group III base oil squeeze tied to Gulf shipping, plant damage including Pearl GTL, and refinery choices, not a Washington order to ration motor oil the way gasoline was rationed in 1942.
Sources
https://autos.yahoo.com/ownership/articles/costcos-synthetic-oil-price-just-133000999.html
https://guessingheadlights.com/global-shortage-has-led-to-motor-oil-rationing-at-costco/
https://www.motorbiscuit.com/costco-just-put-a-purchase-limit-on-its-motor-oil-as-prices-surge/
https://ilma.org/base-oil-supply-crisis-continues-even-as-shipping-conditions-improve/
https://ilma.org/ilma-seeks-emergency-relief-from-gm-dexos-program/
https://jobbersworld.com/group-iii-costs-are-still-working-through-the-lubricant-supply-chain/
https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/group-iii-synthetic-oil-shortage-nissan-toyota-rationing/
https://www.carscoops.com/2026/05/nissan-toyota-oil-shortage/
https://www.cbtnews.com/toyota-nissan-potential-synthetic-oil-shortages/
https://www.motortrend.com/news/your-next-oil-change-could-get-more-expensive-and-harder-to-schedule
https://plainshumanities.unl.edu/homefront/homefront.docs.0015.html
https://automotivehistory.org/may-15-1942-gas-rationing-begins-in-us-for-wwii-efforts/
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #MotorOilShortage #CostcoLimits #GroupIII
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Noncitizen Registration Case Prompts Debate Over State Election Practices
HS Claims Versus State Responses on Voter Rolls. Recent ICE Arrest Numbers in the Mid Atlantic. New York Law Limiting Local ICE Partnerships.
None of This Should Surprise American Patriots
A green card holder from Honduras who is not a citizen went online in California, checked the box that he is a US citizen, put United States as his birthplace, and got on the voter rolls. That’s a felony.
He did it after blocking ICE at a federal building and then texting an agent that he could not wait for the midterms so they could start indicting agents one by one. Officials say he never actually voted but the registration happened and the signature matched.
California requires you to swear you are a citizen to register. Most people give a license or Social Security number. The rest can still get on the list and later show an insurance card, gym card, or utility bill at the poll if it is their first federal election. The state hands out health coverage that produces those insurance cards to people who are not citizens. Then it tells the federal government it will not turn over the full voter file so anyone can check how many times this actually happens.
DHS put out numbers saying tens or hundreds of thousands of possible noncitizens sit on rolls in California and a few other states. California called the numbers junk and kept the lists locked. Courts have blocked some of the data requests so far.
Meanwhile ICE ran a two week sweep in Virginia and Maryland suburbs and took 1328 people off the street, almost 400 of them with criminal records or open charges. Those counties limit how much local police can help.
New York just made it illegal for local cops and jails to have formal deals with ICE. Nassau County’s executive called the day the law took effect one of the saddest of his time in office and said it will make his county more dangerous.
He ended the paperwork deal but says he will still work with ICE where he can and is joining lawsuits against the state. He is running for governor against the person who signed the ban.
Federal law already says noncitizens cannot register or vote in federal elections. Doing it can get you prison time and a plane ticket out even if you have a green card. States run the lists. Some of them have built systems that make the lie easy to tell and then fight anyone who wants to look at the names. That is the setup heading into November.
Federal authorities arrested Darwin Jonathan Rivera Flores on August 28 2026 in the San Fernando Valley area of California. He is a 30 year old Honduran national living in Winnetka as a lawful permanent resident. Officials charged him with two felonies: making a false claim to United States citizenship and fraudulent voter registration.
Rivera Flores entered the United States in 2002 and holds a green card. He is not a United States citizen and records show no application for naturalization. Investigators found an online voter registration under a similar name at his address dated November 4 2025.
The form included a check mark next to the statement affirming United States citizenship and listed his birthplace as the United States of America. The application was submitted under penalty of perjury. Officials obtained the registration records and a matching signature from the California Secretary of State. There is no indication he cast a ballot.
In February 2026 Rivera Flores physically disrupted immigration enforcement operations at a federal building in Camarillo. He received a misdemeanor citation, pleaded guilty, and was placed on one year of probation. Between April and July 2026 he sent text messages to a federal agent. One message referenced the midterms and stated the agent would lack qualified immunity so that people could begin to indict agents one by one.
First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli described the arrest as the first of many in ongoing election fraud investigations. He stated that California allows noncitizens to register easily and receive mail ballots, making it difficult to know how many noncitizens appear on the rolls. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said noncitizens who commit fraud to vote violate federal law and should expect prosecution. The Justice Department renewed its request for California to allow an audit of voter rolls.
Federal law and California law restrict voting in state and federal elections to United States citizens. Registration requires an attestation of citizenship under penalty of perjury. The California Secretary of State states that an affidavit of registration serves as proof of citizenship only for voting purposes. Applicants must be at least 18 years old on election day, reside in the state, and not be serving a prison term for a felony or found mentally incompetent to vote.
The state estimates that 98 percent of voter registrants provide a California driver license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number.
Those who provide neither receive a unique identifier. First time voters in a federal election who registered by mail or online without those numbers may be asked to show identification at the polls. Acceptable documents include a driver license, passport, employee identification, commercial establishment card, credit or debit card, student or military identification, health club identification card, or insurance plan identification card. Non photo documents such as a utility bill or bank statement also qualify if they show name and address.
California expanded state funded Medi Cal coverage to income eligible adults regardless of immigration status in prior years. Starting January 1 2026 the state froze new full scope enrollments for most undocumented adults age 19 and older who lack satisfactory immigration status. Existing enrollees can retain coverage if they renew on time.
Dental benefits for that group end July 1 2026 except for emergencies, and premiums are scheduled for some adults in 2027. Children and pregnant individuals remain eligible regardless of status. Insurance cards from such programs appear on the list of acceptable identification for the limited group of first time voters described above.
The Department of Homeland Security stated in July 2026 that a preliminary review identified as many as 190832 potential noncitizens registered to vote in California along with smaller numbers in New Jersey, Nevada, and Pennsylvania.
The agency sent letters to the secretaries of state requesting collaboration on verification. California officials called the figures unsubstantiated and noted that the state had not shared its full voter file. Other analyses and state responses describe detected cases of improper registration as rare after review.
The Justice Department sued California and more than two dozen other jurisdictions seeking complete voter registration lists including personal data. A federal judge dismissed the California case in January 2026, citing privacy laws and limits on executive authority over elections. Appeals and additional suits continue in various courts. The administration has also directed use of federal databases to screen for noncitizen registrants. Immigrant advocacy groups filed suit alleging inaccurate targeting of naturalized citizens.
In August 2026 Immigration and Customs Enforcement carried out Operation Safe Community in the Virginia and Maryland suburbs of Washington. The agency reported 1328 arrests over 14 days from August 1 to 14.
Officials said nearly 400 of those arrested had criminal convictions or pending charges in the United States, including cases involving murder warrants, sexual assault, kidnapping, and gang membership. The operation occurred in areas with sanctuary type policies that limit local cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed the Local Cops Local Crimes Act in May 2026.
The law took effect in late August 2026 and prohibits state and local agencies from entering formal 287 g style agreements that deputize local officers for immigration enforcement or allow ICE to use local jail space for civil immigration holds. It also restricts questioning solely for immigration status without a judicial warrant and limits ICE access to certain locations. Supporters say it keeps local resources focused on local crime. Critics say it prevents coordination that removes individuals with criminal records.
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman opposed the law. He called August 26 2026 one of the saddest days of his tenure as county executive because the measure would make the county more dangerous. Nassau ended its 287 g agreement to comply with the technical requirements but Blakeman said the county would continue informal cooperation where possible and would join lawsuits by other sheriffs challenging the statute. Nassau had previously housed large numbers of ICE detainees.
Blakeman is the Republican nominee for governor against incumbent Democrat Kathy Hochul. Polls in 2026 have shown Hochul leading by margins ranging from 4 points in some partisan surveys to 10 or 20 points in others. The race remains competitive in suburban and upstate areas according to available data. Both candidates have made public safety and immigration enforcement central campaign issues.
Federal law makes it a crime for a noncitizen to register or vote in a federal election.
Conviction can lead to prison time and deportation even for lawful permanent residents. States administer voter registration and must balance access with eligibility rules. Disputes over data sharing, identification standards, and local federal cooperation continue in courts and legislatures ahead of the November 2026 elections.
Address links:
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/ice-cooperation-law-enforcement-new-york/
https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/hava-id-standards
https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/medi-cal-immigrant-eligibility-faqs/
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/15/us/california-voter-roll-lawsuit-trump.html
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #OnlyCitizensVote #EnforceTheLaws #AuditTheRolls
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Official Totals From the Harbor Gateway Street Takeover
LAPD Releases Final Count After Early Estimates Circulated - 128 Juveniles Cited for Curfew Violations
Law enforcement conducted a large operation against an illegal street takeover at South Figueroa Street and West Alondra Boulevard in the Harbor Gateway area of Los Angeles, near Gardena, early Saturday, September 5, 2026.
The Los Angeles Police Department later released official totals. Sixty nine people were arrested. Five hundred seventy citations were issued. About two hundred vehicles were impounded. Seven firearms and canisters of nitrous oxide were recovered. Police estimated that more than seven hundred people were at the intersection.
Early on scene reports put the arrest count near five hundred and the tow count near one hundred sixty, with six firearms recovered. Those figures were preliminary. The department’s later count is the one used here: sixty nine arrests, about two hundred impounds, and seven firearms.
A street takeover is an illegal gathering in which people block a public street so drivers can perform burnouts, donuts, speed contests, or other stunts in front of a crowd. California Vehicle Code section 23109 covers speed contests, exhibitions of speed, aiding those acts, and blocking a roadway to stage them. Spectators can be cited for being present at a speed contest. Minors can be cited for curfew violations.
Police called the response Operation Street Sweeper. Officers used intelligence gathering and drones to identify four planned takeover locations overnight. The crowd later concentrated at Figueroa and Alondra. Officers moved in from multiple directions and boxed in the intersection. More than one hundred fifty LAPD officers took part. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and the California Highway Patrol also responded. Drones and helicopters were used overhead. Jail buses and tow trucks were brought to the scene.
Four Homeland Security Investigations agents were also seen at the scene. Chief Jim McDonnell said those agents were assigned to a human trafficking task force, stayed on the perimeter for officer protection, took no enforcement action in the takeover itself, and were not there for immigration enforcement.
Of the sixty nine arrests, sixty six were for participating in or aiding a street race or takeover. One person was arrested on suspicion of assaulting a police officer. One person was arrested on suspicion of battery. One person was arrested on suspicion of obstructing or interfering with officers. No officers were reported injured.
Of the five hundred seventy citations, four hundred forty two were issued to people accused of being spectators at a speed contest or exhibition of speed. One hundred twenty eight citations were issued to juveniles, ages eleven to seventeen, for curfew violations. Police said the youngest person identified at the gathering was eleven years old. Parents later arrived to pick up children, some of whom had citations.
Police recovered seven firearms and several canisters of nitrous oxide. Officials said nitrous oxide can be inhaled and can also be used to increase engine power. One vehicle caught fire during the operation. Officers extinguished the fire. Councilman Tim McOsker said some drivers crashed into other cars while trying to leave, which he described as a demolition derby.
McDonnell said some of the impounded vehicles were stolen, some were rented, and some were borrowed from parents. He said people generally do not use their own cars for this activity. He also said the gathering was criminal behavior, not harmless fun, and that children there were in an active crime scene and subject to arrest.
The intersection is in Council District 15. McOsker said street takeovers have been common there on weekends, especially in summer, and that nearby homes and apartment buildings are affected. Home surveillance video showed people running through the neighborhood and jumping fences as officers closed in. The operation took place on the first night of Labor Day weekend. Officers moved in around 2 a.m. to 3:30 a.m.
Under California Vehicle Code section 23109, a first conviction for engaging in a speed contest can include twenty four hours to ninety days in county jail, a fine of three hundred fifty five to one thousand dollars, forty hours of community service, and a possible license suspension of ninety days to six months. Aiding a speed contest, aiding an exhibition of speed, or blocking a road to stage one can include up to ninety days in jail and a fine of up to five hundred dollars. Vehicles used in these offenses can be impounded.
McDonnell said the operation was only the beginning and that the department would continue to track similar events. He said authorities would keep making arrests and impounding vehicles when staffing allows. He also said he supported crushing vehicles used in takeovers. Mayor Karen Bass said the city has zero tolerance for illegal street racing and takeovers and that the events put drivers, spectators, and bystanders at risk. After the weekend, city officials said they would target fifty of the worst takeover intersections.
Figueroa Street and Alondra Boulevard has been a repeat location for these gatherings. Street takeovers in Los Angeles County have been tied by officials to blocked roads, crashes, fireworks, stolen vehicles, and other crimes, including thefts from nearby businesses after some events.
Regular street racing task force teams are small. McOsker said some bureau teams have fewer than ten officers and that crowds can reach six hundred to seven hundred people. This operation used a larger force in order to hold the scene rather than only disperse it.
The official result of the September 5 operation is sixty nine arrests, five hundred seventy citations, about two hundred vehicles impounded, seven firearms recovered, nitrous oxide seized, and one vehicle fire. More than seven hundred people were estimated to have been at the intersection when officers moved in.
Address links
Intersection: South Figueroa Street and West Alondra Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90061
Map: https://maps.google.com/?q=Figueroa+Street+and+Alondra+Boulevard+Los+Angeles
LAPD: https://www.lapdonline.org/
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department: https://lasd.org/
California Highway Patrol: https://www.chp.ca.gov/
Council District 15: https://cd15.lacity.gov/
California Vehicle Code section 23109: https://california.public.law/codes/vehicle_code_section_23109
NBC Los Angeles: https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/harbor-gateway-street-takeover-bust/3937956/
Daily Breeze: https://www.dailybreeze.com/2026/09/05/large-street-takeover-in-harbor-gateway-turns-into-demolition-derby-amid-arrests/
Los Angeles Times: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-09-07/lapd-arrest-69-people-impound-200-cars-at-illegal-street-gathering-in-harbor-gateway
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #OperationStreetSweeper #StreetTakeover #LAPD
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
"That shirt is so ugly.....not even A.I. wants to know you."
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2-GR3TUhNM4
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #aicamouflage #stoptheflock #invisabletoai
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content.
What Closed San Diego Airspace and What Did Not
HAPS tests, Japan rain, and Indonesia ash in the same news cycle
Today’s featured video stacked a San Diego flight halt, a shiny object in the sky, Florida phone videos, Japan rain, and Indonesia volcanoes into one coverup.
Airport records say a drone near the field, plus a balloon, stopped a single runway airport and delayed hundreds of flights. The bright thing over the city lines up with a tracked high altitude comms platform, the kind Sceye flies as a cell tower in the sky.
That’s human hardware with a company name. It’s not proof of a alien airship, a fake invasion, or Project Blue Beam.
Night orbs next to helicopters are usually lights, drones, or weak camera footage. Nagoya flooded because the rain beat the drains. Indonesian volcanoes erupt because that is what they do. Government UAP files exist and still don’t identify these clips.
Everyone is free to believe what they want, but splicing separate facts into one secret plot is not reporting.
San Diego flights, the high object, and the official cause
San Diego International Airport paused arrivals and departures on Friday 4 September 2026 after airport staff identified a drone and a weather balloon near the field. The FAA issued a temporary halt. Operations were reported clear by about 4:30 p.m. local time. Flight tracking data showed more than 400 flights delayed as the stop hit a single runway airport at the start of a heavy travel weekend. That delay figure is real. A full multi day shutdown of the airport because of a mystery airship is not what officials reported.
Residents also photographed a bright, reflective object high over the region. Tracking data and local reporting identified a high altitude balloon, including a platform logged near about 54,000 feet. FOX 5 San Diego reported that Sceye, a U.S. company that builds high altitude platform systems, confirmed one of its test flights was passing the area that day. The company has been flying long range stratospheric vehicles to test mobile broadband, voice, text, and internet from the stratosphere. That’s a known commercial and research program, not a secret craft with no owner.
Airport statements separated two problems. The object that forced the operational pause was the low level drone near the airfield, with a weather balloon also listed in the immediate vicinity. The high shiny object people filmed from neighborhoods sat well above normal arrival and departure paths.
Controllers do not close a major airport because a tracked balloon is floating ten miles up. They do stop traffic when an unauthorized drone is near a runway or tower. That distinction is the part viral clips skip.
A weather balloon can disrupt an airport if it is close enough to traffic. A drone near a single runway airport can stop everything at once. Both can happen on the same afternoon. That is inconvenient and costly. It is not proof that the FAA invented a balloon story to hide a non human airship. The public statements, the flight trackers, and the company confirmation all point to human hardware plus an unauthorized drone. Anyone who wants a different conclusion needs evidence that those official identifications are false, not a video of a silver dot in the sky.
Arizona and Florida orb videos and helicopters
Clips of bright orbs with helicopters nearby have circulated for years. Some Arizona helicopter and orb videos that match the style in the transcript date to 2025 and earlier, including a Whetstone Arizona clip that analysts and commenters have already argued was landing lights on aircraft flying in formation.
Florida clips of lights with helicopters also appear on social media on a regular cycle. One recent Florida local news report of shimmering lights over Maitland on 5 September 2026 offered no official identification and noted that similar displays have been satellites, high altitude aircraft, or Space Coast launch plumes.
A helicopter near a light in the sky does not prove pursuit of a UAP. Firefighting aircraft, law enforcement, training flights, news helicopters, and military aircraft all fly at night with strobes and landing lights. A second light with no obvious blink can be a drone, a balloon, a planet, a reflection, another aircraft with reduced lighting, or a camera artifact. Phone video at night is a poor sensor. It compresses bright points into orbs and hides distance and speed.
Government UAP files released in 2026 do include military reports of orbs, including helicopter encounters at test ranges. Those records are real documents. They also remain unresolved in many cases and do not identify the San Diego object or any specific Florida backyard video as the same phenomenon. Mixing a tracked communications balloon over California with older or unverified Florida phone clips is not investigation.
The claim that the same object flew from Arizona to Florida in a few hours and was escorted by military helicopters across the country is not supported by FAA tracking, NORAD statements, or airport logs published for that weekend. If the military was running a nationwide intercept of a non human craft, the evidence would not be a compilation of unlinked social videos. It would be radar tracks, official incident reports, and consistent timing. Those items are not in the public record for this claim.
High altitude platforms that look like silver airships
Sceye and other firms build large helium lifted platforms that fly in the stratosphere. Typical operating height is around 54,000 to 65,000 feet. The vehicles can look like reflective airships or balloons. They carry radios meant to act like a cell tower in the sky. One platform is marketed as covering an area comparable to hundreds of ground towers. Sceye completed a long Pacific test with SoftBank in August and early September 2026, flying from the United States toward Japan and back. That timeline matches the San Diego sighting window.
These vehicles are designed to be seen from the ground as a bright or metallic point. Chrome or reflective skins are not camouflage against satellites and ADS B style tracking. They are materials chosen for weight, solar load, and durability. Flight tracking of at least one balloon over San Diego was public enough that hobbyists posted the registration and altitude.
High altitude platform systems are dual use. They can carry comms, sensors, and disaster comms. They’re not proof of alien occupation of U.S. airspace. They also aren’t a weather balloon in the school science fair sense. Officials used “weather balloon” as a category for an unpowered or lightly powered high object. That wording is sloppy for a purpose built HAPS test, and sloppy wording feeds suspicion. Sloppy wording is still not a confession of a coverup.
It would be nice if a company is flying a 200 plus foot class platform across a metro area, gave the public clear notice. At the very least to avoid public panic.
Japan rain, sewers, and floods
Nagoya and the wider Tokai region took record rain on 8 September 2026. Nagoya recorded 104.5 millimeters in one hour, above the city’s previous benchmark from the 2000 Tokai heavy rain. Linear rain bands overwhelmed drains built for about 50 millimeters per hour.
Streets flooded. Manholes and sewer outlets blasted water upward because the system was past capacity. Rivers rose. Authorities issued high level flood warnings and large evacuation orders. Hundreds of vehicles were stranded. Homes took above floor and below floor flooding. Schools closed. Subway and rail service stopped in places.
Water shooting from roads is what happens when a sewer and storm system is pressurized beyond design. It is not evidence of a mysterious vibration weapon or a UFO related rupture of the city. Japan sits on a wet climate, aging pipes, and dense pavement that cannot absorb a 100 millimeter hour burst.
The meteorological agency documented the rain band. City water officials reported pumps running almost at full inventory.
Videos of clean looking water and later street rivers are consistent with first flush from paved surfaces and then standing flood water mixed with runoff. They aren’t proof that “all the sea line was broken.” Coastal storm surge and inland cloudburst flooding are different mechanisms. The Japan event reported in early September 2026 is documented as extreme rainfall, not a simultaneous worldwide collapse of nature.
Linking Nagoya floods to U.S. sky videos, weather, volcanoes, and flight delays happening in the same week on a planet with 8 billion people and constant cameras going is coincidence… not alien conspiracy.
Indonesia volcanoes
Indonesia had multiple eruptions in the same window, including Anak Krakatau, Semeru, Ili Lewotolok, and Mount Ibu. Ash closed or disrupted airports. Anak Krakatau produced a multi day eruptive pulse visible to satellites.
Semeru continues frequent explosions as a highly active cone. Officials treat these as separate volcanoes on the same subduction zone, not one coordinated blast.
Geologists have said concurrent eruptions in the Ring of Fire are expected, they’re not mystical.
Lava and ash videos look extreme because they are. They don’t require a UFO explanation. Indonesia records thousands of eruptive events in a year across many vents.
Emergency warnings in Japan and aviation alerts in Indonesia are ordinary state functions during rain and ash. They are not proof that “the entire world is going under chaos” on a biblical timetable. Disaster footage is real. The interpretive leap is not.
UAP file releases, demons, and Project Blue Beam
The Trump administration has been releasing UAP records in 2026 through PURSUE. Multiple tranches went public from May onward. The files include historical cases, military reports, imagery, and unresolved incidents. Officials present this as transparency. Analysts have noted that many items are old or inconclusive and that the releases have not produced a confirmed non human craft in public. That is the actual state of the disclosure, not a completed alien announcement.
Vice President JD Vance said in a March 2026 interview that he doesn’t think the phenomena are aliens and that he thinks they’re demons, framing the issue through Christian teaching about unseen good and evil. That is his stated belief. An exorcist making a similar claim is a religious interpretation. Neither statement is a laboratory identification of a gray alien body. Treat it as theology or personal opinion unless physical evidence is produced.
Project Blue Beam is a 1990s conspiracy theory from Serge Monast. It claims NASA and other bodies will fake an alien invasion with holograms to install a single world government. There is no verified program, budget, or technical demonstration that matches that script. Recycled Blue Beam talk appears whenever lights are filmed. It is not a documented active operation. Using it as the default explanation for a tracked HAPS flight and a drone delay is circular: assume the plot, then read every object as the plot.
The honest position is narrower. Drones near airports are a real safety failure. High altitude comms platforms are real and poorly explained to the public in the moment.
Some military UAP cases remain unexplained on paper. Floods and volcanoes are real geophysics. Phone videos of orbs are mostly unresolved and often weak. Stacking those facts into one invasion or one demonic disclosure is a narrative choice. It is not what the documents and the airport logs show.
Source links
https://www.sandiegoville.com/2026/09/mysterious-high-altitude-airship.html
https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/delay-san-diego-airport/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_UFO_files
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/30/jd-vance-alien-ufo-are-demons
https://www.iflscience.com/project-blue-beam-the-1990s-ufo-conspiracy-that-keeps-coming-back-83240
Explore my Website - The Brutal Truth Home Page
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #SanDiegoGroundStop #TrackedNotUnknown #HAPSNotUFO
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Canada Chooses Higher Costs and Lower Access - Tariffs Hit After a Decade of Weak Growth
Retaliatory duties of 15 to 50 percent now apply to $27.6 billion in United States goods
Canadian retaliatory tariffs of 15 percent, 25 percent, and 50 percent took effect at 12:01 a.m. on September 8, 2026.
They cover about $27.6 billion Canadian in annual United States imports, matched dollar for dollar and rate for rate against United States Section 338 and Section 232 duties that hit $27.6 billion of Canadian goods on August 22. Steel and aluminum products that already faced 25 percent Canadian duties now face 50 percent.
Dairy items such as milk and cream, cheese, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, electronics, furniture, and clothing are on the list. Energy, electricity, and potash were left out.
Prime Minister Mark Carney released a video address the same day. He said the American tariffs will hurt some Canadians. He said that would not be easy and he would not pretend otherwise. He then told Canadians the most powerful response is buying Canadian products and traveling inside Canada. Make your decisions at the kitchen table, he said, not at the border. Forty million people on the ice, nobody in the stands. He framed the tariffs as necessary protection so American goods do not enter Canada duty free while Canadian goods face duties going the other way. He also said the United States wanted dependency rather than partnership and that Canada would not accept it.
That message lands on an economy that already showed weak results before this round of tariffs. Business sector labour productivity growth averaged 0.5 percent a year from 2015 to 2024 after averaging 1.4 percent from 1981 to 2014. Real GDP per capita grew far more slowly than in the United States after 2015. One analysis put the 2024 level near $59,700 instead of nearly $65,000 if earlier productivity trends had held. Living standards measured that way barely moved over a decade while the United States pulled further ahead. Investment per worker fell. Capital per worker declined. Those numbers are public and they predate the current fight.
So when the statistics say investment per worker fell and capital per worker declined, the concern is not simply an abstract economic number. It means the average worker may have fewer tools, machines, technology, and other productive resources behind them than they did previously.
Put simply: If one country keeps upgrading the factory while another stops investing in its factory, eventually the first country will produce more with each worker. Tariffs may become part of that economic problem, but the underlying weakness existed before the tariff dispute began.
Food bank use is high. Food Banks Canada recorded nearly 2.2 million visits in March 2025, the highest figure in its HungerCount series. Food insecurity data put the rate near one in four people in recent surveys. Housing costs absorb 30 percent or more of income for more than 40 percent of households. These pressures existed while governments spent years on other priorities instead of pipelines, ports, and LNG capacity that would have given Canada more options in any trade dispute.
Imagine having one customer who buys almost everything you produce. If that customer suddenly says, “I am going to charge you more or buy less,” you are in a weak position if you have nowhere else to sell your product. But if you have several customers waiting, along with the pipelines, ports, and facilities needed to reach them, you have much more bargaining power.
So the basic argument is this: Canada’s economic problems didn’t suddenly appear because of tariffs. Many Canadians were already struggling with food costs, housing costs, and weak economic growth. At the same time, Canada had not built enough infrastructure to give itself as many options for selling its energy and natural resources to other countries.
In reality, the country was already financially stretched, and it had fewer economic escape routes when the trade fight arrived.
Canada still sends the large majority of its goods exports to the United States. The share fell to 66.3 percent in July 2026 from 72.6 percent a year earlier. That is a decline, not an escape. Geography is fixed. The world’s largest consumer market sits directly south. Oceans lie east and west. Alaska sits to the northwest. Shipping the same goods across the Atlantic or Pacific adds cost and time. Other partners do not match United States buying power for most Canadian products.
Carney’s government has signed additional agreements and points to rising non United States exports, including a 7.4 percent jump in July. Those volumes remain far smaller than the United States market.
Canada is trying to reduce how dependent it is on the United States, but replacing the American market is much harder than simply finding another buyer.
For example, imagine a Canadian company makes $100 million worth of products every year. If $70 million of those sales go to American customers, the company cannot suddenly replace those $70 million by selling to Europe, Asia, or South America. It might find new customers, but building those relationships, arranging transportation, meeting different regulations, and competing on price takes time.
The geography makes the problem even clearer. The United States is directly beside Canada, sharing the world’s longest international border. A Canadian manufacturer can put products on a truck or train and send them into a massive American consumer market. Shipping those same products across the Atlantic or Pacific can take longer and cost considerably more.
The United States goods trade deficit with Canada was $48.3 billion in 2025, down from the prior year. Canada has run a merchandise surplus with its southern neighbor for years. United States officials argue the surplus and Canadian barriers on dairy, autos, and other sectors justify pressure for more production inside the United States. Canadian officials say they walked away from talks in late August because the terms would have increased reliance on the United States rather than reduced it. Each side blames the other for last minute demands. The text of any near final offer has not been released to the Canadian public.
President Trump posted that Bombardier would no longer sell planes in the United States unless it builds them there. He wrote that more than 50 percent of the company’s revenue comes from the United States and that the firm treats America like a piggy bank. Company figures put the United States share of 2025 revenue near 55 percent on about $9.6 billion in sales. Bombardier employs thousands in more than 20 United States states, builds wings in Texas, and sources from about 2,800 American suppliers. A ban or steep new barrier would hit a company that already has a large American footprint and would put Canadian aerospace jobs at risk. The threat is leverage, not a completed order.
Think of it like a restaurant that buys ingredients from several local farms but prepares the final product somewhere else. If the government says the restaurant can only sell locally if the final cooking happens locally, the restaurant may move part of its operation. That could create new local jobs, but it could also change who supplies the restaurant and increase its costs.
And there is one other important point: Trump’s statement is a threat or policy demand, not evidence that a completed sales ban has already been implemented. Reuters described it as Trump’s declaration that Bombardier would no longer be allowed to sell in the United States unless it began manufacturing there.
So Trump is using America’s enormous aircraft market as leverage.
Bombardier wants access to American customers, while Washington wants more production taking place inside the United States. The interesting part is that Bombardier is already deeply tied to American workers, suppliers, and businesses, which means any serious restriction could affect both sides.
Carney’s address asked Canadians to accept higher prices on imported milk, cheese, appliances, and electronics and to stay home for vacations. Those goods are now more expensive at the border. Canadian dairy already operates under supply management quotas. Adding 25 percent or 50 percent duties on United States cheese and milk products raises grocery costs for households that already use food banks at record levels. Telling people the answer is to buy only Canadian and cancel trips south does not create new customers in Europe or Asia overnight. Building that market access takes years and capital that productivity data show has been scarce.
Put bluntly, the message is essentially this: Canada is going to fight the United States economically, and Canadians are being asked to absorb some of the consequences while the country tries to become less dependent on American trade.
A Canadian family normally buys American cheese, appliances, electronics, or other products because they are cheaper or simply because they are readily available. Canada puts a 25 percent or 50 percent tariff on some of those American goods. The Canadian importer pays the tariff, and that added cost can eventually show up in the price on the store shelf. Canada’s official tariff list confirms that some U.S. dairy products face a 50 percent tariff, while certain appliances face 25 percent.
So the simplest translation of the message is: “We cannot control what Washington does. We are going to reduce our dependence on America. In the meantime, Canadians may have to pay more, buy differently, travel differently, and accept some economic discomfort while we build another path.”
That is considerably more complicated than simply telling Canadians to “buy Canadian.”
The United States economy is larger and less dependent on any single neighbor. Most American consumers will notice the dispute mainly on news reports. Effects will concentrate in border states that sell steel, autos, appliances, and farm equipment into Canada. Those states also hold midterm races. Canadian tariffs on those products therefore land on politically sensitive United States regions. That is not accidental targeting. It is also not cost free for the smaller economy that started with weaker productivity and higher export concentration.
Canada had decades of easy access under successive trade agreements. Goods that met the rules entered the United States duty free. That arrangement produced a surplus and supported entire industries. The same period saw weak investment in energy infrastructure that could have given Ottawa more bargaining power. Keystone XL was cancelled. LNG export capacity lagged competitors. When the larger partner decided the terms needed to change, Canada discovered how little spare leverage it had built. Diversification speeches do not replace pipelines and plants that were not constructed.
Walking away from talks and matching tariffs is a choice. They are presented as standing up for sovereignty. The immediate result is higher prices for Canadian buyers of listed American goods, pressure on export industries that still ship two thirds of their product south, and a request that households tighten spending while the government talks about new deals on other continents. Those deals are documented. They don’t replace the volume or the logistics of the United States market in the short term. Currency weakness could make Canadian goods cheaper abroad later. That path usually arrives after job losses and lower incomes at home.
The data on productivity, per capita output, food bank visits, and export shares are not opinions. They are published by Statistics Canada, the OECD, the Fraser Institute, Food Banks Canada, and official trade releases.
The tariff lists are published by Finance Canada and the White House. Carney’s own words acknowledge pain. The policy still proceeds.
Canadians will pay the difference at the store, at the plant gate, and in the labour market while officials describe it as the price of independence.
Official sources:
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/260903/dq260903a-eng.htm
https://foodbankscanada.ca/resources/annual-reports/
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #CanadaPaysThePrice #TariffsHitHome #TwoThirdsStillSouth
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
No Excuse Accounting of Mothers Charged After High Profile Massachusetts Trial
A Hard Look at the Recent Headlines of Mothers Accused of Heinous Acts..
People who favor conservative justice look at this list and see a collapse of the most basic duty a parent has. A child is a person who depends completely on the adult in the room.
When that adult kills the child or leaves the child to die, the first question is not what diagnosis might apply.
The first question is who failed the child and who will be held to account for it.
A parent doesn’t get to treat a child as disposable once their own mind starts failing. The duty runs one way. The child didn’t choose the adult’s decline. The child still needed to be kept alive. If the adult killed the child or left the child to die, the first fact stays the same. The child is dead. The adult was the one in charge. Diagnosis can explain how the mind broke down, but it doesn’t turn the act into something other than a failure of the most basic obligation a parent has.
Lindsay Clancy sent her husband out of the house and three children ended up dead in the basement. The defense called it psychosis. Prosecutors called it planning. The jury hung. That outcome doesn’t change the fact that three children are gone. Conservative justice says the court still owes those children a clear finding of responsibility. A mis-trial is unfinished business. Sooner or later there will be a trial.
The other cases sit in the same frame.
A toddler left nine hours in a locked car that hit 117 degrees. A mother who tells officers she killed her daughter and needs to go to jail. A two year old shot by his own mother, a disabled seven year old found bound in a closet after weeks of alleged abuse, an infant left unsupervised in a tub, a toddler beaten while the mother is later charged alongside the boyfriend … These aren’t accidents. They’re failures of conscience that produced dead children.
Walsh is the one case where officials said the mother had been following the Clancy trial that same day. That detail matters only because it shows how quickly a high profile claim of no criminal responsibility can travel. It doesn’t prove the other women copied her. But it does prove that some adults will reach for the same language when a child is dead.
Are these the faces of evil?
Conservative justice doesn’t stare at booking photos and declare people “Monsters”. A parent who ends a child’s life or allows it to end through extreme neglect has done something evil. Evil is the opposite of Good.
Mental illness can be real. Exhaustion can be real. Divorce stress can be real.
None of those facts restore the child or cancel their responsibilities. The duty comes first. When it’s abandoned, the law is supposed to say so without apology.
This isn’t a mysterious pattern or conspiracy theory. It’s what happens when personal responsibility is treated as optional and the child’s right to live is treated as secondary to the adult’s explanation. That’s the view from the conservative justice side.
The children are still dead.
The charges are still pending.
The question of conscience isn’t complicated.
Deja Coleman 29 of Lawrenceville Georgia was charged with second degree murder and second degree cruelty to children after her 1 year old son died July 29 2026.
Police said she left the child in her locked car in the employee parking lot of Northside Hospital Gwinnett where she worked. The boy was inside the vehicle for about nine hours. nypost.com
The interior temperature of the car measured 117 degrees after the child was removed. Another hospital employee spotted the unresponsive toddler and called for help. Emergency responders broke a window but the child was already dead. Coleman told investigators she dropped her two older children at daycare and forgot the youngest was still in the car. fox5atlanta.com
Police described Coleman as devastated. She was arrested and booked into Gwinnett County Jail. A judge later allowed her a private visit to view her son’s body before the funeral. She arrived in handcuffs and shackles. fox5atlanta.com
Her attorney said she made a good faith mistake after nights of little sleep while caring for a teething child and working long shifts. The charges treat the death as the result of neglect rather than claimed intent to harm. The case remains pending. ajc.com
Kailey Erhart 22 of Mandan North Dakota faces two counts of murder attempted murder and other felony charges after an incident on August 6 2026.
Police said two of her three young children died and one survived serious injuries. The children were ages 3 years 5 months and about 1 year. wdayradionow.com
Officers found Erhart holding a knife and covered in blood. She told them to kill her. Court records state she had earlier threatened the children’s father with a handgun while holding one child and said say goodbye to your kids. Video from the father’s phone captured part of the scene. valleynewslive.com
A judge set cash bond at 3 million dollars citing the extreme nature of the alleged conduct and public safety concerns. Erhart is held in the Burleigh Morton Detention Center. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for October 6 2026 with a trial date in February 2027. newsweek.com
Family members reported the surviving child underwent surgery and is expected to make a full physical recovery. The father of the children has been identified in records. No mental health defense details have been publicly entered at this early stage. kfyrtv.com
Kaitlin Evans 38 of Cincinnati Ohio along with Nessa Keaney 23 and Kirby Rankin 33 were each charged with murder and child endangerment in the death of 7 year old William Evans on August 6 2026.
Police said the three women lived together and co parented the boy who had developmental disabilities. His body was found bound with duct tape in a closet of their Oakley apartment. cincinnati.com
A detective testified the child showed signs of beatings burns and being held underwater over a period of weeks. The Hamilton County coroner later said the cause of death was blunt trauma to the head. Evans arrived barefoot at a nearby emergency room claiming her partner had tried to kill her and taken the boy. fox19.com
Each defendant was held on 1.1 million dollars bond. The boy’s other biological parent spoke in court saying the group had kept the child away for nine months. All three have pleaded not guilty. A grand jury was scheduled to review the case. lawandcrime.com
Family members said the boy had told grandparents weeks earlier that he did not want to return home. The case involves three adults charged together rather than a single parent acting alone. Proceedings continue in Hamilton County. foxnews.com
Sienna Herrera 23 of Odessa Texas was charged with manslaughter and child abandonment after an infant died following a bathtub incident reported around August 10 2026.
Police said she left the infant and two other children unsupervised in a bathtub for an extended period at a housing community on Tropicana Street. firstalert7.com
Investigators first charged her with endangering a child. After an autopsy and further review they obtained a warrant for manslaughter a second degree felony. The infant was pronounced dead. Herrera was wanted by Odessa police at the time of the charging update. mrt.com
Authorities stated the children had been left without supervision for a prolonged time. The investigation remained active. No additional public details on the exact cause of the infant’s death beyond the unsupervised bathtub circumstances were released in initial reports. yourbasin.com
Herrera faces felony charges in Ector County. The case is one of neglect leading to a child’s death rather than a claimed planned act. Police asked the public for information on her whereabouts after the warrant was issued. mrt.com
Anum Khalil Khan 35 of Abilene Texas was charged with capital murder of a person under 10 years old after her 3 year old daughter Mirha died on August 12 2026.
Khan drove to the Abilene Police Department parking lot with the child who had obvious injuries. The girl did not survive despite emergency efforts. ktxs.com
Khan told officers I killed her and that she needed to go to jail. Search warrants recovered knives a cloth belt and other items from the family home. Court documents described injuries consistent with strangulation and stabbing. Khan had recently been involved in divorce proceedings. ktxs.com
She was held without bond in Taylor County Jail. Family members said she worked as an audiologist. Her father described seeing her looking at divorce papers early that morning before she left with the child. bigcountryhomepage.com
The capital murder charge carries the possibility of the death penalty or life without parole in Texas. The investigation by Abilene police Major Crimes Division continued after the initial arrest. Khan remains in custody. bigcountryhomepage.com
Devorah Diaz Perez 18 of Canton Georgia was charged with second degree murder two counts of second degree cruelty to children and three counts of reckless conduct after her 2 year old son died on August 3 2026.
Police responded to an unresponsive child call at a home on Cartersville Street. The boy was pronounced dead at a hospital. fox5atlanta.com
Her live in boyfriend Celso Edison Vicente Y Vicente 22 had been arrested the same day and charged with malice murder and first degree cruelty to children. Authorities said he severely beat the child. Diaz Perez was interviewed weeks later and then charged. people.com
She was booked into the Cherokee County Adult Detention Center without bond. Police have not released a full public account of her specific alleged role beyond the charges filed after consultation with the district attorney. The child’s body showed bruises and other injuries according to reports. people.com
Canton Police Chief Marty Ferrell called the death heartbreaking and said detectives would complete a thorough investigation. Both adults remain in custody. The case treats the mother as criminally responsible along with the boyfriend. wsbtv.com
Ephreana Brady of Humboldt Tennessee was charged with first degree murder and employing a firearm during a dangerous felony after her 2 year old daughter died on August 27 2026.
Officers found Brady on the front porch holding the unresponsive child who had a gunshot wound. Brady was also holding a handgun to her own head. wreg.com
Police removed the child and the gun. The toddler was taken to Jackson Madison County General Hospital and later died from the gunshot wound. Investigators determined Brady was responsible for the shooting. wbbjtv.com
She was held on 2 million dollars bond in Gibson County Jail. At her September 2 2026 arraignment she entered a not guilty plea by video. A preliminary hearing was set for October 21 2026. wbbjtv.com
If convicted she faces life in prison. The Humboldt Police Department and district attorney investigator handled the case. Anyone with information was asked to contact police or Crime Stoppers. jacksonsun.com
Corie Walsh 40 of Frankfort Illinois was charged with first degree murder after her 2 year old son Barrett was found dead on September 1 2026.
A neighbor discovered the boy in the basement of the family home and began CPR. An autopsy found he died from asphyxia caused by ligature compression of the neck. usnews.com
Prosecutors said Walsh had become very invested in the Lindsay Clancy trial and was texting friends about it until 12:30 p.m. that day less than four hours before the child was found. Walsh was located in a bathtub with self inflicted injuries. She told investigators she killed her son because she believed he was the devil and the anti Christ. washingtontimes.com
Her attorney said Walsh was experiencing a psychotic episode and called the death a tragedy for the family. Walsh is a mother of four. The two older children were at school and a baby was found unharmed in the home. Her husband was out of town. wisn.com
Prosecutors sought to keep her detained citing statements about possible harm to other children and her husband. She remains charged in Will County. This is the only case among those listed in which officials publicly noted the mother’s close attention to the Clancy trial. abcnews.com
And To Date - The Most Infamous of All So Far…
Lindsay Clancy of Duxbury Massachusetts faces three counts of murder in the deaths of her children Cora age 5 Dawson age 3 and Callan age 8 months on January 24 2023.
Authorities said she sent her husband out of the house then strangled the children in the basement of their home. She then injured herself and jumped from a second story window leaving her paralyzed from the waist down. She has pleaded not guilty. patriotledger.com
Jury selection for her trial started July 20 2026 at Plymouth Superior Court with opening statements and testimony beginning July 27 2026. The defense said she suffered from postpartum psychosis and lacked criminal responsibility. Prosecutors said she planned the killings and was not psychotic. More than 80 witnesses testified over several weeks. wmtw.com
The jury of nine women and three men deliberated for seven days without reaching a unanimous verdict. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4 2026. The murder charges remain in place. A status hearing is set for September 29 2026 when prosecutors will decide whether to retry the case. usatoday.com
Clancy remains held in a psychiatric hospital. She and her former husband have filed civil lawsuits against medical providers alleging failures in her treatment before the deaths. The case received wide coverage focused on questions of mental illness claims versus responsibility for the deaths of three young children. nytimes.com
Source links
https://www.masslive.com/news/2026/07/as-lindsay-clancy-trial-begins-a-look-back-at-the-cases-key-moments.html
https://www.patriotledger.com/story/news/courts/2026/07/20/lindsay-clancy-murder-trial-duxbury-plymouth-ma--live/90979408007/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/crime/2026/09/04/lindsay-clancy-no-verdict-whats-next-new-trial/91608890007/
https://nypost.com/2026/07/31/us-news/georgia-mom-leaves-baby-in-117-degree-car/
https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/lawrenceville-police-arrest-mother-after-1-year-old-dies-hot-car
https://www.wdayradionow.com/news/local-news/mandan-woman-charged-with-killing-two-children-injuring-another/
https://www.newsweek.com/kailey-erhart-north-dakota-mom-accused-killing-children-12358606
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/crime/2026/08/07/torture-and-beatings-came-before-7-year-olds-death-police-say-william-evans-kaitlin-evans/91212640007/
https://www.firstalert7.com/2026/08/10/odessa-woman-wanted-manslaughter-after-infant-dies-following-bathtub-incident/
https://ktxs.com/news/local/i-killed-her-court-docs-reveal-new-details-in-abilene-3-year-olds-death
https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/mother-also-charged-murder-death-2-year-old-canton
https://wreg.com/news/humboldt-woman-accused-of-killing-2-year-old/
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2026-09-07/illinois-mom-charged-with-killing-toddler-was-closely-following-lindsay-clancy-trial-officials-say
https://abc7chicago.com/post/corie-walsh-mother-boy-killed-domestic-homicide-brook-stone-court-home-charged-murder-frankfort-police/19789803/
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #ParentalDutyFirst #AccountabilityOverExcuse #TheChildCameFirst
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
She Followed the Clancy Trial. Then She Killed Her 2-Year-Old Son
Corie Walsh Charged With Murder in Death of 2-Year-Old Son Barrett
On or around September 1–2, 2026, Corie A. Walsh, 40, of Frankfort, Illinois (a Chicago suburb), was alleged to have killed her 2-year-old son, Barrett (“Bear”) Walsh, by hanging/strangulation in the basement.
A neighbor found the child unresponsive and began CPR; he was pronounced dead at a hospital. Walsh was found in a bathtub after an apparent suicide attempt with a knife (non-life-threatening injuries).
She was charged with three counts of first-degree murder. Three other children in the home were unharmed; the father was out of state. Walsh allegedly told investigators she did it because the boy was “the devil” and “the anti-Christ.” The coroner ruled the death a homicide by asphyxia. san.com
Prosecutors stated in court filings that Walsh had “recently become very invested” in (or closely followed) the Lindsay Clancy trial. That is the documented link.
There is no public reporting that she attended Clancy rallies, wore pink, donated, or was an organized activist; “supporter” in the viral posts is an inference from her reported interest in the case.
Her attorney has indicated she experienced a psychotic episode.
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #CorieWalsh #BarrettWalsh #LindsayClancy
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
CENTCOM Reports Iran Missile Attack on U.S. Aircraft Carrier and Destroyer Followed by Strikes on Three Iranian Tankers
IRGC Claims Retaliation on Additional Vessels CENTCOM Silent
U.S. Central Command reported on September 5 2026 that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched ballistic missiles at two U.S. Navy warships.
The targets were a U.S. aircraft carrier and a guided missile destroyer operating in regional waters. CENTCOM called the attacks unprovoked.
The two U.S. ships successfully evaded the incoming missiles. No American personnel were harmed. CENTCOM confirmed both vessels continued operations without damage.
U.S. forces then struck three Iranian crude oil carriers in response. The action took place the same day. Two tankers were permanently disabled. One tanker was completely destroyed. The first disabled tanker was the M/T Downy. It was hit off the coast of Kharg Island. The second disabled tanker was the M/T Stark 1. It was hit near Jask.
The third tanker was the M/T Kylo also known as the Noxen. It was unladen and operating in the Gulf of Oman. U.S. forces directed the crew to abandon ship first. Then the vessel was struck in multiple critical locations and rendered inoperable.
CENTCOM stated the three tankers belong to a multibillion dollar shadow network. That network funds the IRGC and its regional proxies. Iran has no means to defend these ships.
Adm. Brad Cooper commander of CENTCOM issued a direct statement. He said if you shoot at two of our ships we will impose an even higher economic cost taking out three of yours. He added we will not hesitate to defend American forces and if necessary destroy Iran’s limited and exposed oil fleet.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated the policy in plain terms. If Iran shoots at U.S. ships we will destroy and sink their oil tankers. He noted Iran’s oil tanker fleet is defenseless. The incident occurred amid ongoing U.S. enforcement of a naval blockade on Iranian ports. Fighting over control of the Strait of Hormuz has continued for months. The waterway handles a large share of global oil shipments.
Iranian state media confirmed U.S. strikes on at least one tanker near Kharg Island. They reported the crew evacuated with no casualties on that vessel. Iran’s foreign ministry called the U.S. actions illegal and aggressive. The IRGC later claimed it targeted three oil tankers using unauthorized routes in the Strait of Hormuz plus three U.S. affiliated vessels in other areas. CENTCOM has not confirmed those claims.
Iran’s joint military command warned that continued U.S. actions against Iranian ships would bring more severe strikes on U.S. military vessels. The command said the response could expand. U.S. officials have not identified the specific aircraft carrier or destroyer by name in public statements. Multiple carrier strike groups remain active in the Arabian Sea.
The strikes used a mix of fighters and drones according to additional U.S. reports. Video released by CENTCOM showed multiple impacts on the targeted tankers including hull breaches on the destroyed vessel.
Oil prices rose after the exchange as markets reacted to renewed fighting near a key energy chokepoint. Both sides have used economic pressure alongside military action throughout the conflict.
Source links
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/05/middleeast/iran-us-tanker-kharg-intl
https://taskandpurpose.com/news/us-hits-three-tankers-strait-hormuz-iran/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/sep/05/us-military-iran-tankers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj64rrne643o
https://www.reuters.com (search September 5 2026 CENTCOM Iran tankers)
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #IranMissilesMiss #USHits3Tankers #CENTCOMAnswersFire
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Plymouth Clancy Mistrial: The Holdout, the Hung Jury, and What the Law Actually Requires
It’s another case of “What’s BAD is GOOD.” How can this woman POSSIBLY be INNOCENT?
One juror stood in the way of a verdict in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. That is what the defense said. That is what the jury foreperson’s notes were said to show.
The trial ended Friday, September 4, 2026, in a mistrial. There is no not guilty verdict. There is no guilty verdict. There are three dead children and an unresolved murder case.
She (Clancy) does not deny that she killed them. The fight in court was never about who did it. The fight was about whether she had criminal responsibility when she did it.
Lindsay Clancy, 36, a former labor and delivery nurse from Duxbury, Massachusetts, is charged with three counts of first degree murder. In January 2023 she strangled her children Cora, age 5, Dawson, age 3, and Callan, age 8 months, with exercise bands in the family home while her husband was out. She then jumped from a window in a suicide attempt and survived with serious injuries.
Massachusetts law does not treat “I was sick” as a magic pass.
The test is whether, because of mental disease or defect, she lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of her conduct or to conform her conduct to the law. The defense said postpartum psychosis took that capacity away. The prosecution said she planned the killings, sent her husband out of the house, acted with purpose, and knew right from wrong. Those two accounts cannot both be true in the way the law requires. A jury of nine women and three men heard more than eighty witnesses over about five weeks and then sat for roughly thirty eight to forty hours across seven days. They still could not agree.
In a serious criminal case in the United States, all twelve jurors must agree. That rule was locked in by the Supreme Court in 2020. Eleven votes is not a verdict.
Ten votes is not a verdict. One holdout is enough to stop the machine. That is by design. It is also why a single person can leave a courtroom with no answer after weeks of evidence.
On Thursday the jury foreperson sent notes that the defense treated as an 11 to 1 split for a finding that Clancy was not criminally responsible. Attorney Kevin Reddington told the judge one juror had admitted doubt and then refused to apply the reasonable doubt instruction. He asked Judge William Sullivan to remove that juror. Sullivan refused. He said he would not pick a side inside the jury room. He questioned jurors one by one. He sent them back. He did not dump the holdout. That choice was the legally safer one. It was also the choice that left the case hanging.
No one outside that room has the full transcript of what was said in deliberations. The actual notes were not dumped in public word for word. Reddington’s version is the loudest version. Prosecutors said there was no clean way to prove who was right about the law and who was not.
A judge who removes a juror because the majority is angry at the minority is a judge who is steering a verdict. Courts treat that as dangerous for a reason. A holdout can be stubborn. A holdout can also be the only person still applying the burden of proof the way the instructions require. You cannot know which one you had from press conferences.
On Friday the panel sent another note. It said, with a heavy heart, they could not reach a unanimous decision and would not be able to.
Reddington tried an emergency appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to stop the mistrial and keep pressing the holdout issue. The higher court said no. Sullivan then declared a mistrial. That is the official result. Not an acquittal. Not a conviction. A hung jury.
A hung jury does not prove Clancy was insane. It does not prove she was sane. It proves twelve people could not all accept one legal conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt. Hung juries are uncommon. Experts put them at about one in twenty criminal cases. They happen more in long, high heat trials packed with expert fighting over a defendant’s mind. This was that kind of trial. The judge had already given the so called dynamite charge, the extra push that tells jurors to keep trying. It did not break the wall.
Cora, Dawson, and Callan were killed in their home by their mother. Any honest report starts there. Mental illness can be real. Postpartum psychosis exists. It is rare. It can include delusions and a break from reality. None of that erases the act. None of that forces a jury to accept the defense theory.
The prosecution’s job was to prove criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt.
If eleven jurors thought the state failed and one juror thought the state did not fail, the law still requires all twelve. That is the cost of the unanimity rule. It protects defendants from a rush to convict. It also blocks a rush to excuse.
Reddington later said the other jurors were robbed by one man with an agenda. That is a lawyer talking after he lost the chance at a directed result.
District Attorney Timothy Cruz said the case has always been about the three children and that no decision on a retrial would be made on the spot. Both statements serve a side. The court record is colder. The jury said it was done. The judge accepted that. The charges remain. Clancy stays held at Tewksbury State Hospital without bail. A status hearing is set for September 29, 2026.
Cruz can retry the case with a new jury. He can drop or reduce charges. He can talk plea. A retrial means another long fight in a case the public already knows too well. Jury selection will be harder. Witnesses will be older in the record and the same on the facts.
If prosecutors walk away from a criminal retrial, civil commitment can still keep her locked in a hospital if she is found to be a danger. An insanity win at trial would not have meant she walks out the door and goes home. It would have meant hospital control instead of a prison sentence. People who talk as if a not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility finding is freedom are not telling the truth.
The holdout fight exposed a hard fact about American criminal law. The system would rather end with no verdict than force a verdict by cutting out the person who will not sign. That can look weak when eleven people want to move. It can look necessary when the state is asking a jury to decide a mother’s mind on the day she killed her kids. Sullivan chose not to convert a disagreement into a one sided win for the defense.
The Supreme Judicial Court let that stand. Anyone who wanted a clean not guilty stamp did not get one. Anyone who wanted a murder conviction did not get one either.
Public talk about this case often splits into two camps that refuse to hear each other.
One camp treats Clancy as a victim of a medical system that failed her and treats any holdout as cruelty. The other camp treats the mental health claim as a story used to dodge the plain fact of three strangled children. Both camps skip the legal question the jury was actually given.
The question was not “Did she suffer?” The question was not “Are the children dead?” The question was whether the Commonwealth proved she was criminally responsible under Massachusetts law. After forty hours, twelve people could not all say yes or all say no.
If there is a second trial …and there will be, the same evidence will be back in front of new strangers.
The same experts will argue about psychosis, planning, medication, and what Clancy understood in those minutes. The same photos and the same timeline will be on the table. A different twelve may lock in. They may split again. The law will still demand every vote. One person will still have the power to stop the rest. That is the rule that just ended this trial with no answer.
Address links:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/04/us/lindsay-clancy-trial-unanimous-verdicts.html
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/09/04/us/lindsay-clancy-trial-deadlock
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/03/us/live-news/lindsay-clancy-trial
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/04/us/live-news/lindsay-clancy-trial
https://www.wbur.org/news/2026/09/04/lindsay-clancy-murder-trial-verdict-massachusetts
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/lindsay-clancy-trial-case-updates-jury-verdict-mistrial/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/09/04/metro/lindsay-clancy-trial-live-updates/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/09/03/metro/jury-deliberations-holdout-juror/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpwlrj2je1po
https://apnews.com/live/lindsay-clancy-trial-09-04-2026
https://www.newsweek.com/lindsay-clancy-verdict-judges-jury-actions-may-be-dangerous-expert-12402400
https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/why-the-lindsay-clancy-trial-ended-in-a-deadlock
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/whats-next-lindsay-clancy-after-mistrial-2026-09-04/
It’s another case of “What’s BAD is GOOD.” How can this woman POSSIBLY be INNOCENT?
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #ClancyMistrial #OneJurorHoldout #NoVerdictNoClosure
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Meta’s $18 Billion Child Safety Deal Still Rests on Age Checks That Miss Kids and Tag Adults
Time caps and night blocks only work if the company can tell children from adults.
Meta agreed in late August 2026 to pay up to about $18 billion and change how teenagers use Facebook and Instagram.
The deal ended a federal trial in Oakland after states said the company built products that hooked young users and hid the mental health risks.
Meta did not admit it did anything wrong. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers signed off on the pact. Florida refused to join and called the money peanuts. New Mexico stayed out because it had already won its own case.
The main pot is about $16.7 billion for 47 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Texas took a separate $1 billion deal. That is how the total gets sold as nearly $18 billion. About 70 percent, or $12.7 billion, is set to go out over 10 years. The other 30 percent, about $5.3 billion, only pays if YouTube and TikTok accept similar time limits, night blocks, and age checks and also pay matching money. Meta booked a legal expense of about $10 billion for the third quarter of 2026. The company took in more than $200 billion in revenue in 2025. This is a large check. It is not a company ending check.
States get money they can spend on youth online safety programs or other priorities. California is in line for $1.5 billion to $2.1 billion. Other states get hundreds of millions over a decade. That is why attorneys general called it historic. Money to state offices is not the same thing as proof that a teenager in a bedroom will be safer next month. The rules only bite if Meta can tell who is under 18 and who is not. That is the weak joint in the whole machine.
The product rules look strict on paper. Users Meta treats as ages 13 to 17 get a default two hour daily cap across Facebook and Instagram. Time on both apps counts together, including if Meta links multiple accounts. Only a parent can raise that cap. Night mode blocks the feed, Stories, Explore, and Reels from midnight to 6 a.m. School mode mutes most push alerts from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Night alerts are also muted from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. unless a parent turns that off. Teens get nag screens after 15 minutes of continuous use and again at 60 and 90 minutes. Like counts are hidden by default. Extreme makeup and cosmetic surgery filters are blocked. Teens can pick a feed that is not driven by the recommendation engine. Direct messages sit outside the time and night blocks.
Those limits last for years, but the tightest time and night rules start as a five year promise. If rival apps sign on, the daily cap can drop to one hour per app and the night block can stretch from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. for 10 years.
Meta is already running newspaper ads telling TikTok and YouTube to copy the plan. A large slice of Meta’s own payout depends on those rivals playing along. Teens who hit a wall on Instagram can still open another app.
None of this works if a 14 year old signs up as a 25 year old. The settlement therefore demands stronger age assurance and an independent auditor with wide access. Some filings say the age system must be independently tested and keep false positives no higher than 10 percent for users ages 16 to 17 and 3 percent for users ages 13 to 15. Users who claim they are over 18 but skip the age test for two weeks face extra limits meant to keep suspicious adults away from teens. Meta must also try to link accounts owned by one person so kids cannot dodge the clock with a second profile.
Read the fine print. The settlement doesn’t order Meta to demand a government ID or a video selfie from every user. Reuters reported that the text stops short of those hard checks. Meta has long used softer clues instead: birthday posts, school grade talk, friend graphs, and reports from other users. For kids under 13, the deal pushes extra steps, including searches of friend networks to find and kill those accounts. The company may temporarily use data from children it has already flagged to train an AI model that hunts more under 13 accounts later.
Meta is not starting from zero. It already asks for an ID or a Yoti face age estimate when a user tries to change a birthday from under 18 to over 18, or when an account is flagged as too young.
In 2026 it rolled out AI that scans photos and videos for visual cues such as height and bone structure. Yoti is a British digital identity company. Meta uses one of its products as an age check vendor. It’s not a government agency and not a Meta app. When Instagram or Facebook doubts your age, it can send you to Yoti instead of, or as well as, asking for a government ID.
Meta says this is not facial recognition because it does not name the person in the frame. It still looks at faces and bodies at scale. If the system decides an account may belong to a child, the account can be shut down until the owner proves an age. Proof often means an ID or a face tool. Behavioral monitoring plus visual analysis plus ID on appeal is the real stack, even if the court order never uses those words for every login.
Experts have been blunt that this stack is not ready to police hundreds of millions of accounts. Syracuse professor Alexis Ingber said the design changes look good on paper but rest on age technology that has failed in the main. Age estimation is an estimate. Best test numbers still miss by more than a year for many people. Error rates rise for women and for people who are not white. Teens near 17 and adults near 18 sit in the worst zone. Kids have already fooled face tools with video game faces and cheap disguises. A system that is wrong 3 to 10 percent of the time, applied to a huge user base, will lock out real adults and leave real minors inside.
Privacy cost is not a side issue. It is the price of the enforcement plan. Government IDs, face images, and long running behavior logs are high value targets. Faces and fingerprints do not reset like a password. Third party age vendors have already leaked records.
A Discord related breach exposed tens of thousands of government ID images and personal details from people who uploaded papers after a face check flagged them. Academic reviews of U.S. age gates found low compliance, easy bypass, and extra sharing of user data with other companies that handle location, cards, or document checks. Every adult who only wants to open Facebook can get pulled into that pipeline if the model guesses wrong.
Meta points at Apple and Google. It wants app stores to verify age and get parent approval before a teen downloads an app, then pass a clean age signal to developers. That would shift the checkpoint off Meta’s login screen and onto the phone store. It would also put government style identity checks closer to the gate of the entire app economy. Device makers have their own legal and product reasons not to become the nation’s age police. Until that happens, Meta is left with profiling, visual scans, user reports, and selective ID demands. That mix is exactly what privacy lawyers say creates identity theft risk without a clean record of catching every child.
The legal background matters. The 1998 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act makes companies liable if they collect personal data from kids under 13 without a parent. Meta has argued that the same law makes hard ID and biometric collection dangerous. Child safety advocates say firms hide behind that law so they can keep young users. The Federal Trade Commission said it would not punish firms that collect data only to check age. States can still enforce their own versions of the rule. The settlement tries to walk that line: more hunting for underage accounts, more AI training on flagged child data, no blanket ID wall for every adult. That is a policy choice, not a solved engineering problem.
What the public is being sold is protection of minors. What the public is actually getting is a 10 year experiment that sorts people by guesswork and then restricts the ones the guess labels as young.
Adults who fail a face estimate or skip a test can land in a locked down feed. Minors who lie well enough can keep the old product. Messaging stays open at night. Rival apps may never join, which would shrink both the cash and the tighter time rules. Florida’s refusal is a reminder that not every state thinks the terms match the harm alleged in court. Meta keeps its platforms, avoids a verdict, and still gets to tell the country it is investing in stronger technology.
Parents who want less phone time for their kids can use the new default caps if Meta tags the account as a teen in the first place. Schools may see fewer midday pings. Predators lose some easy paths if private defaults and stranger blocks hold. Those are concrete gains.
A settlement this large still depends on age tools that researchers, civil liberties groups, and even Meta’s own history show are leaky, biased, and hungry for sensitive records.
Anyone who uses Facebook or Instagram should treat the next wave of “prove your age” prompts as a data event, not a minor pop up.
The bill is huge. The lock on the door is not.
Address links:
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/26/tech/meta-states-settle-trial-children
https://www.theverge.com/policy/985032/meta-state-ag-kids-online-safety-settlement
https://about.fb.com/news/2026/08/agreement-with-state-attorneys-general-supporting-teens/
https://about.fb.com/news/2026/05/ai-age-assurance-teens/
https://www.eff.org/pages/does-tech-even-workhttps://kgi.georgetown.edu/research-and-commentary/age-assurance-online/
https://apnews.com/article/meta-trial-instagram-settlement-97d342f2a33d835eda2356c5e1af9e37
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #MetaSettlement #AgeChecksFail #PrivacyNotOptional
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth SEPTEMBER 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
CEO of Pfizer Being Questioned After a World Economic Forum Meeting
This video has now been BANNED on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube.
The WEF wants it scrubbed, and their lackeys are happy to oblige.
https://1hebrutaltruth1.substack.com/p/ceo-of-pfizer-being-questioned-after
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #wef #scandemic #covidshots
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth AUG 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Latest US/Iran War Update
As of August 31, 2026, the U.S.–Iran war (now about six months old) flared again after a roughly one-month lull. Fighting is still limited compared with the heaviest earlier phases, but both sides traded strikes over the last 48 hours and President Trump said more U.S. action is coming.
What just happened
-
Sunday, Aug. 30: The U.S. struck two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz. CENTCOM said IRGC forces were preparing to launch rockets with sea mines into the strait. Iran said the strike killed two or three and wounded others. It was the first disclosed U.S. strike on Iran since late July. ms.now
The United States hit two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday August 30. American commanders said the Revolutionary Guard was getting ready to fire rockets carrying sea mines into that waterway. Iran said two or three of its people died and others got hurt. That was the first strike Washington publicly admitted since late July.
It was a shot at hardware sitting on an island that sits on one of the most important oil routes on earth. Both sides already spent six months trading blows and then talking like they might stop. Then the launchers went up and the planes came in. That is the whole story on that day. One side said mines were coming. The other side said people died. The strait stayed the prize.
-
Monday, Aug. 31: Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they fired ballistic missiles at U.S. bases in Jordan (King Hussein and Al Azraq) and targeted U.S. personnel at a base in the UAE. Jordan said it intercepted eight missiles. U.S. sources said there was no significant damage and no new U.S. deaths reported from that barrage. Iran also claimed mines hit a tanker in the strait; the U.S. denied that.
jinsa.org
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said on Monday August 31 they shot ballistic missiles at American bases in Jordan named King Hussein and Al Azraq and also went after American troops at a base in the UAE. Jordan said it knocked down eight missiles. American sources said the bases were not badly hit and no new American deaths came from that attack. Iran also said mines struck a tanker in the strait. The United States said that did not happen.
That’s the payback shot after the American strike on Larak Island the day before. Iran fired. Jordan stopped most of it. Washington said the damage was small and nobody new died. Then both sides argued about a tanker. Same fight as always. Missiles in the air. Claims on paper. The waterway still sitting in the middle of it.
-
Trump’s response: In a Fox News interview Monday he said the U.S. will “hit them hard” and “there will be a response.” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said more war is not in Iran’s interest and talked up dialogue the same day.
cbsnews.com
Donald Trump told Fox News on Monday the United States will hit Iran hard and there will be a response. That came after Iran fired at American bases. Same day Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said more war is not good for Iran and he talked about talking instead.
Trump said the United States will hit Iran hard. Pezeshkian said more war is a bad deal and he wants talks. That’s the split after six months. One capital is promising the next strike. The other is asking for words, but we’ve heard that before.. Still no deal.
How we got here (short version)
The war began February 28, 2026, with coordinated U.S.–Israeli strikes on Iran. Trump initially said it would last weeks. A June 17 memorandum of understanding with Pezeshkian to wind down fighting and reopen Hormuz later collapsed; Trump declared it “over” in early July. After more tit-for-tat strikes, both sides largely paused kinetic attacks for about a month while Washington emphasized sanctions and economic pressure.
The Aug. 30–31 exchange broke that pause.
The core fight is still over the Strait of Hormuz (normally ~20% of seaborne oil). The U.S. says it has cleared mines from international lanes and loosened Iran’s grip; Iran still claims control and has been talking with Oman about a corridor. Oil is elevated (Brent around $90). jinsa.org
Casualties and cost (reported figures)
-
U.S.: About 18 killed and 750+ wounded in published tallies (figures have been revised over time). No new U.S. death was reported from today’s Jordan/UAE attacks. Cost estimates cited in recent reporting are in the tens of billions.
globalsecurity.org
-
Iran: Thousands dead in various compilations (Iranian and independent tallies differ widely; civilian and military numbers are disputed). Leadership changes followed the opening strikes, including the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei early in the war.
What to watch next
Trump has threatened further strikes. Pezeshkian is at a Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit and is expected to see Putin and Xi. Congress has been wrestling with war funding. Neither side has a signed, durable ceasefire. Commercial airline and oil-market risk remains high while Hormuz stays contested.
This is a live conflict; claims from both governments about damage, mines, and “who started this round” should be treated as competing accounts until more independent confirmation.
Israel’s not flying in this latest Hormuz round. The August 30 strike on Larak Island and Iran’s August 31 shots at U.S. bases in Jordan and the UAE were a U.S.–Iran exchange. Reporting through August 31 says Israel conducted no new operations against Iran in that window.
Israel started this war with the United States on February 28, and then got pulled back when Trump wanted negotiated talks, and has mostly watched the Hormuz fight from the sidelines since.
What Israel is doing instead
Standing off Iran, for now. After Trump told Netanyahu to hold fire during earlier flare-ups, Israeli jets haven’t been part of the recent U.S. hits on launchers and mines. Israeli officials have said they want to hit Iranian energy targets; Washington has blocked that because it fears Iran would smash Gulf oil infrastructure and spike prices. jewishvirtuallibrary.org
Warning it will go back in. Energy Minister Eli Cohen said this week Israeli intelligence thinks the joint campaign set Iran’s nuclear program back two to four years, and that if Iran tries to rebuild nukes or ballistic missiles, “even if there is an agreement with the United States, we will be there to attack.” That is Israel’s standing veto over any U.S.–Iran deal. globalsecurity.org
Still fighting on other fronts. While the U.S. and Iran traded shots over Hormuz, Israel kept operating in Gaza, southern Lebanon (Hezbollah / security zone), the West Bank, and Syria (including strikes aimed at blocking a Turkish footprint). Defense Minister Israel Katz has said Israel will stay on Mount Hermon and in the Syrian buffer as long as it sees a jihadist threat. Israel is still moving forward with their “Greater Israel Project.” jinsa.org
Security and politics at home. Shin Bet just pulled Yair Netanyahu back to Israel after what it called a serious threat. Netanyahu says Iran tried to kill one of his sons. Gas prices in Israel are at record highs because of the war. A large Greece defense deal was announced August 31. Knesset elections are in the background. jinsa.org
Did Iran put out a contract for the assassination of Baron Trump?
There is a reported TV bounty video.
But its not confirmed as an independently verified Iranian government “contract” that has been shown to be an active hit job.
Late last week, Iranian state-linked TV (reported as Channel 3 / IRIB, with IRGC-tied media in the mix) aired a short propaganda clip titled something like “Where to kill Barron Trump?” It claimed his movements were watched and that a $10 million reward was on offer.
Iran International first pushed the clip; outlets including Reuters, CNN, Politico, and the Times of Israel repeated it. The U.S. Secret Service said it is aware of the video and looks at anything that can be seen as a threat. It would not discuss protective details. reuters.com
What has not been proven in public:
-
That the $10 million is a real funded contract with a named payer
-
That an Iranian team is actually in place
-
That the “surveillance” in the video is real (it used crude graphics and some names that look fake)
Iran’s security chief Mohsen Rezaei later called reports of a plot a lie and blamed Netanyahu for using the story. That denial doesn’t erase the broadcast. State TV in Iran isn’t independent. Airing a bounty clip is still a threat, even if officials later say there is no plot. Analysts have treated it as psychological warfare mixed with real risk, not as courtroom-proof of a signed contract. m.economictimes.com
Iran’s state media put out a video that offered money for Barron Trump’s death. Secret Service is treating it as a threat. A verified operational contract has not been shown. Iran’s own security chief denied an actual plot.
Still wired into the U.S. war machine. Even when Israeli planes are not bombing Iran this week, the alliance is tight: U.S. aircraft in Israel, shared targeting data, tankers refueling Israeli jets, joint lessons-learned meetings between air chiefs. Israel wants regime change. Trump wants Iran to change behavior and reopen Hormuz cheaply before midterms. That gap is why Israel is a partner that is also a bystander. cfr.org
The Brutal Truth Is…
Israel helped open this war with America. Now it wants a harder finish than Washington will take. Israeli planes are not in the Larak hit or the Jordan shots today. That fight is America and Iran. Jerusalem sits it out and still claims the last word on Iranian bombs.
While those two trade fire over the strait, Israel holds the line in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza.
It tells Tehran the nuclear file is still Israeli business even if Trump cuts a deal. That’s the split. America wants the oil moving. Israel wants the threat dead. US in the water. Israel on the ground and it won’t let go.
Related address links for the Aug 30–31 U.S.–Iran flare-up and Israel’s role:U.S. strike on Larak Island (Aug 30)
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-forces-strike-two-iranian-launchers-irans-larak-island-us-official-says-2026-08-30/
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/30/us-strikes-irans-larak-island-01056585
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/08/30/us-strikes-iran-missile-sites-larak-island/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/30/us-strikes-iranian-launchers-on-larak-island-amid-strait-of-hormuz-tensions
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2026/08/30/us-iran-war-larak-island-iran-war/91539747007/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Larak_Island_attack
Iran response / Jordan and UAE bases (Aug 31)
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2026/08/latest-developments-us-iran-war-1
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/aug/31/us-iran-israel-hormuz-oil-donald-trump-larak-kharg-island-uae-jordan-latest-news-updates
https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/iran-war-us-strikes-strait-of-hormuz-larak-island/
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/30/us-strikes-irans-lark-island-in-first-attack-in-weeks
Trump / Pezeshkian statements
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/31/trump-threatens-further-action-us-iran-exchange-fire
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2026/08/president-says-more-war-not-irans-interest-after-fighting-flares
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/8/26/trump-tells-al-jazeera-not-in-a-hurry-for-iran-to-return-to-talks
Israel posture while this is happening
https://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/2026-us-israel-war-with-iran/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-remains-on-sidelines-of-us-iran-fight-which-for-jerusalem-is-just-fine-for-now/
https://www.cfr.org/articles/the-iran-war-at-six-months-a-region-and-its-relationship-with-the-u-s-transformed
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israels-netanyahu-says-iran-tried-to-kill-one-of-his-sons-2026-08-24/
https://jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Iran-War-Update-8.31.26.pdf
Six month war context / Hormuz
https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-war-six-months-anniversary-israel-3c4d33b09fdbe19928781c678aa025c9
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2026/aug/28/how-the-iran-war-unfolded-every-attack-and-oil-price-change-visualised
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/28/after-six-months-of-war-what-have-us-iran-gained-and-lost
https://english.news.cn/20260828/234c5a4a5ddc4c9eb4e45bf445bc3ddc/c.html
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-war-oprep.htm
Live / topic hubs
https://www.theguardian.com/world/us-israel-war-on-iran
https://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/strait-of-hormuz/
https://www.c-span.org/Iran
Additional address links on Rezaei, the Barron Trump video, and the Secret Service response:Mohsen Rezaei / security post
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/09/world/middleeast/iran-security-council-guards-commander.html
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/mohsen-rezaei-appointed-secretary-irans-top-security-body-2026-08-10/
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/who-is-irans-mohsen-rezaei-hardliner-appointed-key-security-role-2026-08-10/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_National_Security_Council
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_of_the_Supreme_National_Security_Council
https://shafaq.com/en/Middle-East/Rezaei-named-Supreme-Leader-s-representative-to-security-council
https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/iran-war-mojtaba-khamenei-hard-liners-rezaei-taeb-us-tensions-ptag-2982385-2026-08-29
Barron Trump video / $10 million claim
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-906386
https://www.timesofisrael.com/where-to-kill-barron-trump-iran-said-to-put-10-million-bounty-on-us-presidents-son/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/world/4698147/iran-propaganda-video-barron-trump-assassination/
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/iran-media-claims-barron-trump-has-10-million-bounty-on-his-head-and-is-being-monitored-in-chilling-video/
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/iranian-state-media-targets-barron-trump-video-1816064
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-906753
Secret Service / official U.S. reaction
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-secret-service-aware-iranian-video-threat-against-barron-trump-2026-08-25/
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/iran-barron-trump-threat-intl-hnk
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/25/secret-service-iran-barron-trump-threat-01049014
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/25/secret-service-says-it-is-aware-iranian-state-media-video-threatening-barron-trump/
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/secret-service-confirms-awareness-of-iranian-state-media-video-threatening-barron-trumps-life
Rezaei denial of a plot
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/iranian-security-chief-denies-potential-plot-to-assassinate-trumps-son/
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/432358
https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/irans-security-chief-denies-report-of-assassination-plot-against-trumps-son-barron/articleshow/133581820.cms
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #StraitOfHormuz #IranWar #LarakIsland
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth AUG 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Thank you all for subscribing. If you enjoy and feel the information shared here is important, please share it!
The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
