Observations 2
This can be Observations of just about anything. It's hard to categorize it all. Some things belong in UFO's, some in Science, Space and Nature. But it's when you can't explain what it is we're seeing or just not satisfied with the answers.

Why are people seeing two moons in the sky?

Observations of "two moons" in the sky can be attributed to a combination of astronomical events, optical illusions, and widespread misconceptions. One notable phenomenon is the temporary capture of small asteroids by Earth's gravity, leading to the appearance of a second, albeit faint, natural satellite. For instance, asteroid 2024 PT5, measuring approximately 33 feet across, entered Earth's orbit on September 29, 2024, and remained until November 25, 2024. This "mini-moon" followed a horseshoe-shaped trajectory around our planet but was too small and dim to be observed without specialized equipment. parissecret.com+2captechu.edu+2cntraveler.com+2
Additionally, a recurring hoax suggests that Mars will appear as large as the full moon during certain periods, particularly around August 27. This myth originated in 2003 and resurfaces periodically, misleading many into expecting a spectacular celestial event. In reality, even at its closest approach, Mars appears as a bright, reddish point in the sky, significantly smaller than the moon. Live Science+3reuters.com+3Space+3Space+1reuters.com+1
Furthermore, optical illusions can cause the illusion of two moons. For example, reflections from double-pane windows or camera lenses can produce a duplicate image of the moon, leading observers to believe they are witnessing an astronomical anomaly. reddit.com
In summary, while the concept of two moons in the sky is captivating, such sightings are typically the result of temporary celestial events, misinformation, or visual artifacts rather than the presence of a second prominent lunar body.
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
The "Missing Time" Situation and Why People Are Freaking Out Over It

The Mud Flood Hypothesis posits that a significant, worldwide cataclysmic event—often referred to as a "mud flood"—occurred in the 19th century, leading to the burial of entire civilizations and their architectural structures.
Proponents suggest that this event erased advanced societies, such as the purported Tartarian Empire, from historical records, and that modern architecture with submerged lower floors serves as evidence of this occurrence.

Critics argue that these architectural features can be explained by conventional reasons, such as changes in urban planning, building renovations, or natural sedimentation over time. Mainstream historians and archaeologists do not support the Mud Flood Hypothesis, citing a lack of credible evidence and inconsistencies with established historical and geological data.
Recent archaeological discoveries continue to shed light on ancient civilizations, often revealing structures that have been buried over time due to natural processes rather than sudden, global catastrophes. Notable findings include:
-
Lost Mayan City of Valeriana: Using advanced Lidar technology, archaeologists uncovered the ancient city of Valeriana in the dense jungles of Campeche, Mexico. The discovery revealed temple pyramids, plazas, and an ancient reservoir, highlighting the extensive urbanization of the Mayan civilization.
-
Ancient Pyramid Near Caral, Peru: A vast pyramid, hidden under earth and vegetation for millennia, was unearthed near the Caral Archaeological Zone. This structure offers new insights into the Caral civilization, one of the earliest advanced societies in the Americas, known for their agricultural expertise and pyramid construction.
-
800-Year-Old Burial Pit in Leicester, England: Archaeologists discovered a burial pit containing the remains of 123 individuals from the early 12th century. The cause of death remains uncertain, but theories include starvation or disease. This site provides significant insight into medieval England's conditions.

These discoveries underscore the dynamic nature of Earth's history and the continuous evolution of human civilizations. While the Mud Flood Hypothesis remains a fringe theory without mainstream acceptance, ongoing archaeological research continues to uncover the complexities of our past, often buried beneath layers of time and nature.
For a visual exploration of the Mud Flood Theory and its claims, you might find the following videos informative:
Tartaria: Lost Civilization or Myth? The Mud Flood Theory - YouTube
The "Missing Time" Situation and Why People Are Freaking Out Over It - YouTube
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

Hormuz Island Iran is Gushing Blood at an Alarming Rate
Recent environmental phenomena have raised concerns and questions about our planet's health and the information governments disclose.
In early February 2025, the Sarandí Canal near Buenos Aires, Argentina, turned a vivid red, alarming local resident. Authorities suspect the discoloration resulted from an industrial chemical spill, possibly involving aniline, a toxic substance used in dyes and medicines. This incident is not isolated; the canal has previously exhibited unusual colors, including green and violet, often accompanied by foul odors, indicating ongoing pollution issues.
Iran’s Hormuz Island, known for its striking red landscapes, recently experienced a rare yet naturally occurring event—red-colored floods following heavy rainfall. This phenomenon, while visually dramatic, is deeply rooted in the island’s unique geological composition. Hormuz Island is rich in iron oxide, a mineral that gives its soil and beaches a deep crimson hue. When intense rainstorms hit the region, the iron-rich soil is washed into the water, turning the flooding streams and coastal waves a blood-red color.
Geologists have long studied Hormuz Island’s unusual terrain, which is part of the Zagros Fold and Thrust Belt, a geological formation that stretches across Iran. The island’s sedimentary layers are composed of volcanic rocks, salt domes, and iron-rich deposits, making it one of the most colorful natural landscapes in the world. The red soil, locally called "Gelack", is even used by residents for cooking, dyeing fabrics, and creating traditional paints.
Although the sight of blood-red waters often raises alarm, this phenomenon is entirely natural and has been observed multiple times over the years, particularly during the rainy season. Unlike cases where red-colored water is caused by industrial pollution, toxic spills, or harmful algal blooms, the red floods of Hormuz are the result of erosion and sediment displacement, a process that occurs in many parts of the world with high iron content in the soil.
Despite its natural origins, the dramatic visuals often spark speculative theories and apocalyptic interpretations, particularly on social media. Some have linked it to biblical or esoteric signs, while others have speculated about hidden governmental knowledge regarding Earth’s changing geological conditions. However, scientific experts emphasize that the event is predictable and well-documented, rooted in the island’s distinctive mineral-rich environment.
This occurrence also serves as a reminder of the Earth's dynamic geological processes. As climate patterns shift and extreme weather events become more frequent, landscapes like Hormuz may experience more frequent episodes of red floods, leading to continued public intrigue and fascination with nature’s striking and sometimes unsettling phenomena.
These events prompt broader questions about Earth's environmental state and governmental transparency. Industrial pollution, as seen in Argentina, highlights the ongoing challenges of regulating waste disposal and protecting natural water sources. The recurring pollution incidents suggest potential lapses in enforcement and raise concerns about the long-term health impacts on local communities.
Natural phenomena, like those on Hormuz Island, underscore the planet's dynamic geological processes. While such events are typically well-understood within the scientific community, public awareness may be limited, leading to misconceptions or undue alarm when they occur.
The extent of governmental knowledge and the transparency of information dissemination are critical factors in public trust. While governments often possess detailed environmental data, the decision to share this information can be influenced by various factors, including economic interests, political considerations, and national security concerns. This selective disclosure can leave the public feeling uninformed or misled about environmental risks and the true state of planetary health.

In conclusion, both anthropogenic activities and natural processes contribute to the environmental phenomena observed on Earth. Ensuring that governments maintain robust environmental regulations and prioritize transparency is essential for fostering public trust and effectively addressing environmental challenges.
New York Post
Argentina canal mysteriously turns bright red, looks like it's 'covered in blood'
7 days ago
River near Buenos Aires turns bright red after suspected industrial dye leak
Hormuz Island Iran is Gushing Blood at an Alarming Rate
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
EMF Radiation and 6G
The conversation surrounding electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation has intensified with the rapid advancements in wireless technology, and the development of 6G is set to push the debate even further. While 5G is still being rolled out globally, researchers and tech giants are already laying the groundwork for the next-generation network, which promises even faster speeds, lower latency, and unprecedented levels of connectivity. However, along with these advancements come concerns about the potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to high-frequency radiation, the impact on human biology, and the broader environmental consequences.
EMF radiation is an invisible form of energy emitted by wireless devices, cell towers, and electronic appliances. While low levels of EMF exposure are a natural part of life, the surge in wireless infrastructure has drastically increased human exposure to artificial electromagnetic fields. The shift from 4G to 5G already introduced higher frequencies in the millimeter-wave spectrum, and 6G is expected to take this even further, utilizing terahertz (THz) frequencies that are currently untested on a large scale. Unlike previous wireless generations, which relied on larger, more widely spaced towers, both 5G and 6G will depend on dense networks of small cell stations, meaning that these sources of radiation will be placed much closer to homes, schools, and workplaces.
The health implications of increased EMF exposure remain a subject of intense debate. Some scientific studies suggest that high-frequency radiation may disrupt cellular function, contribute to oxidative stress, and potentially impact neurological health over long periods of exposure. While regulatory agencies and wireless industry leaders maintain that current EMF exposure levels are within safe limits, skeptics argue that long-term studies are lacking and that public health should not be gambled on for the sake of technological progress. The World Health Organization (WHO) classified radiofrequency EMFs as a "possible carcinogen" in 2011, but the full impact of prolonged, high-intensity exposure remains unclear. Critics of widespread 6G deployment argue that safety studies should be conducted before its mass adoption, rather than after potential risks become evident.
Beyond health concerns, there are also geopolitical and ethical considerations surrounding 6G. As the world moves toward a hyper-connected digital era, 6G is expected to enable massive real-time data collection, AI-driven automation, and advancements in quantum computing. While these innovations offer significant benefits, they also raise questions about privacy, surveillance, and the increasing centralization of information networks. Governments and corporations will have unprecedented access to personal data, and concerns over digital authoritarianism are growing as connectivity expands beyond just smartphones to include smart cities, AI-integrated traffic systems, and even brain-computer interfaces.
Another issue that has yet to be addressed is the environmental impact of increased EMF radiation. With the rise of wireless technology, energy consumption has skyrocketed due to the demand for constant connectivity. The infrastructure required for 6G, which includes an exponential increase in the number of cell towers, satellites, and IoT devices, will contribute to higher energy usage and potentially greater levels of electronic waste. Additionally, the electromagnetic pollution created by dense 6G networks raises concerns about its effects on wildlife, particularly pollinators like bees, whose navigational abilities have been shown in some studies to be disrupted by electromagnetic frequencies.

As the world moves forward with 6G development, the question remains: Is society rushing into an era of hyper-connectivity without fully understanding the consequences? Advocates for technological progress argue that faster and more powerful networks will unlock new possibilities in medicine, space exploration, and global communication. However, skeptics warn that without thorough independent research and strict regulatory oversight, the risks may outweigh the benefits. The coming years will determine whether humanity can strike a balance between innovation and safety or if the pursuit of ever-faster wireless technology will lead to unforeseen consequences that could reshape society in ways we have yet to comprehend.
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
AI JUST CROSSED A RED LINE: Experts Sound the Alarm
The Race for the Best of AI... Forgive them, Lord. They know not what they do.
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Most people put on a hat before they leave their house... Maxine puts on her Temu wig.
The wig has more class and dignity
than the ancient beast underneath it...
Democratic lawmakers like Maxine Waters serve us, not the other way around. This fundamental principle—that elected officials are accountable to the people, not the ruling elite—has been obscured by career politicians who have spent decades consolidating power, shielding themselves from accountability, and treating public office as a personal throne rather than a temporary position of service. Waters, like many entrenched figures in Washington, has built a career on political theatrics while overseeing districts plagued by poverty, crime, and economic decline. The irony of her outrage over government efficiency efforts only underscores the growing disconnect between the political class and the American people.
Recent events have made this dynamic more obvious than ever. As the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Elon Musk work to expose decades of reckless spending, financial mismanagement, and bureaucratic waste, figures like Waters have erupted in outrage—not at the waste itself, but at the attempt to shine a light on it. Instead of supporting efforts to cut unnecessary spending and redirect resources where they are needed, she has chosen to lead public meltdowns, attacking those who dare to challenge the status quo. Her fierce opposition to these reforms raises the question: Who is she really serving? The taxpayers who fund the government, or the bureaucrats and special interests who benefit from the dysfunction?
This kind of reaction is not unique to Waters; it is emblematic of a broader problem within the political establishment. Career politicians in Washington have long viewed their positions as permanent fixtures, rather than as representatives accountable to their constituents. The moment their power is threatened—whether by an audit, a new policy, or a challenge to their grip on government funds—they lash out, deflect, and attempt to discredit those calling for reform.
Waters’ recent threats against DOGE and her public attacks on Musk are not about protecting the interests of everyday Americans; they are about maintaining control over a system that has rewarded inefficiency, corruption, and political patronage for decades.
The growing frustration among the public is not without reason. For years, Americans have watched as their hard-earned tax dollars were funneled into projects that served no real purpose, while politicians like Waters prioritized their own political survival over real solutions. The exposure of bureaucratic waste—like multi-million dollar contracts for redundant projects, ideological training programs with no tangible benefits, and the absurd revelation that government retirement paperwork is still being processed in an underground limestone shaft—has only amplified the anger. The American people are tired of being told to accept government dysfunction as an inevitability. They are demanding answers, and more importantly, action.
Waters and others like her would do well to remember that they do not rule the people—they serve them. Public office is not a birthright, and elected officials who fail to uphold their responsibility to the people will eventually be held accountable. The rise of investigative audits and efforts to reduce wasteful spending are just the beginning of a larger shift in governance, one that seeks to restore efficiency, accountability, and respect for taxpayers. No amount of political posturing can change the fact that Americans are waking up to the reality of how their government operates—and they are no longer willing to tolerate leaders who put their own power above the people they are supposed to represent.
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Goodbye Gulf of Mexico... Hello Gulf of America!
...Also UFO's and other anomalies..
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
You DEFINITELY don't see this every day! MASSIVE convoy transporting MYSTERIOUS container!
In this video MrMBB333 shows high altitude objects in the sky, a MASSIVE convoy escorting the transport of mysterious container, more fog and more blinking lights.
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Radical Feminist Lawmaker Maims Herself To Make A Statement That No One Cares About | Ep. 1532
Today on the Matt Walsh Show, a Democrat politician announces that she has sterilized herself to avoid getting pregnant in Donald Trump's America.
She had to do this, I guess, because of the imaginary law Donald Trump just passed requiring all women to get pregnant. Also, one of the staffers working for DOGE goes by the name “Big Balls.” And now, CNN is on the case. They're on the Big Balls beat and tracking everything that Big Balls does. And a trans-identified male actor was on the verge of making history by winning the Best Actress award at the Oscars. But now his dreams are crashing down after some old tweets have come to light.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-61OG8w6dE
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.